Zhang Hong-Qi, Yip Tsui-Pik, Hui Irene, Lai Vincy, Wong Ann
School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2005 May-Jun;26(3):247-51.
In this study, we sought to test the medical efficacy of a Chinese medical herb product, moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO), on wound healing rate and infection control in burn injury. Standardized deep burn wounds were created on the back skin of rats by applying a hot brass bar for 12 to 18 seconds. MEBO was applied four times per day and compared with petroleum jelly, silver sulfadiazine, and dry exposure therapy. Under such a controlled setting, although MEBO had a better wound healing rate than the dry exposure treatment, it did not show the medical advantage statistically, as has been claimed, over the other two treatments (P > .05), either in terms of wound healing rate or bacterial control. We conclude that the MEBO is not suitable for deep burn wound treatment, particularly when infection is a concern.
在本研究中,我们试图测试一种中药产品——湿润烧伤膏(MEBO)对烧伤创面愈合率和感染控制的医学疗效。通过用热铜棒在大鼠背部皮肤施压12至18秒,制造出标准化的深度烧伤创面。每天对创面涂抹MEBO四次,并与凡士林、磺胺嘧啶银和暴露疗法进行比较。在这种受控环境下,尽管MEBO的创面愈合率优于暴露疗法,但在创面愈合率或细菌控制方面,它并未如所宣称的那样,在统计学上显示出相对于其他两种治疗方法的医学优势(P > 0.05)。我们得出结论,MEBO不适合用于深度烧伤创面治疗,尤其是在存在感染问题时。