Suppr超能文献

急性失语症中句子处理障碍与脑损伤相关。

Brain Damage Associated with Impaired Sentence Processing in Acute Aphasia.

机构信息

University of South Carolina.

University of Iceland.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Feb;32(2):256-271. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01478. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

Abstract

Left-hemisphere brain damage commonly affects patients' abilities to produce and comprehend syntactic structures, a condition typically referred to as "agrammatism." The neural correlates of agrammatism remain disputed in the literature, and distributed areas have been implicated as important predictors of performance, for example, Broca's area, anterior temporal areas, and temporo-parietal areas. We examined the association between damage to specific language-related ROIs and impaired syntactic processing in acute aphasia. We hypothesized that damage to the posterior middle temporal gyrus, and not Broca's area, would predict syntactic processing abilities. One hundred four individuals with acute aphasia (<20 days poststroke) were included in the study. Structural MRI scans were obtained, and all participants completed a 45-item sentence-picture matching task. We performed an ROI-based stepwise regression analyses to examine the relation between cortical brain damage and impaired comprehension of canonical and noncanonical sentences. Damage to the posterior middle temporal gyrus was the strongest predictor for overall task performance and performance on noncanonical sentences. Damage to the angular gyrus was the strongest predictor for performance on canonical sentences, and damage to the posterior superior temporal gyrus predicted noncanonical scores when performance on canonical sentences was included as a cofactor. Overall, our models showed that damage to temporo-parietal and posterior temporal areas was associated with impaired syntactic comprehension. Our results indicate that the temporo-parietal area is crucially implicated in complex syntactic processing, whereas the role of Broca's area may be complementary.

摘要

左半球脑损伤通常会影响患者生成和理解句法结构的能力,这种情况通常被称为“语法障碍”。语法障碍的神经相关性在文献中仍存在争议,分布式区域被认为是表现的重要预测因素,例如布罗卡区、前颞叶区域和颞顶叶区域。我们研究了特定语言相关 ROI 损伤与急性失语症中句法处理受损之间的关联。我们假设,后颞中回的损伤而不是布罗卡区的损伤将预测句法处理能力。104 名急性失语症患者(中风后<20 天)纳入研究。获得了结构 MRI 扫描,所有参与者都完成了 45 项句子-图片匹配任务。我们进行了基于 ROI 的逐步回归分析,以检查皮质脑损伤与对规范句和非规范句理解受损之间的关系。后颞中回的损伤是整体任务表现和非规范句表现的最强预测因素。角回的损伤是对规范句表现的最强预测因素,而当将规范句表现作为协变量时,后上颞叶的损伤预测了非规范句的分数。总的来说,我们的模型表明,颞顶叶和后颞叶区域的损伤与句法理解受损有关。我们的结果表明,颞顶叶区域在复杂句法处理中至关重要,而布罗卡区的作用可能是互补的。

相似文献

1
Brain Damage Associated with Impaired Sentence Processing in Acute Aphasia.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Feb;32(2):256-271. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01478. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
2
3
The Neurobiology of Agrammatic Sentence Comprehension: A Lesion Study.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Feb;30(2):234-255. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01200. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
4
Common and distinct neural substrates of sentence production and comprehension.
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117374. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117374. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
Cortical and structural-connectivity damage correlated with impaired syntactic processing in aphasia.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 May;40(7):2153-2173. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24514. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
6
The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study.
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Feb 10;180:108465. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108465. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
7
The neural basis of reversible sentence comprehension: evidence from voxel-based lesion symptom mapping in aphasia.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;24(1):212-22. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00118. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
8
How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia.
Brain Lang. 2008 Dec;107(3):203-19. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
10
Electrophysiology of prosodic and lexical-semantic processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Dec;107:9-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Partial least squares multimodal analysis of brain network correlates of language deficits in aphasia.
Brain Commun. 2025 Jun 19;7(4):fcaf246. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf246. eCollection 2025.
2
Distinct neural correlates of morphosyntactic and thematic comprehension processes in aphasia.
Brain Commun. 2025 Mar 24;7(2):fcaf093. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf093. eCollection 2025.
3
The relationship between activities of daily living and speech impediments based on evidence from statistical and machine learning analyses.
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 6;13:1491527. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1491527. eCollection 2025.
4
Verbal working memory and syntactic comprehension segregate into the dorsal and ventral streams, respectively.
Brain Commun. 2024 Dec 11;6(6):fcae449. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae449. eCollection 2024.
5
Dissociating reading and auditory comprehension in persons with aphasia.
Brain Commun. 2024 Mar 25;6(2):fcae102. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae102. eCollection 2024.
7
Grammatical Parallelism in Aphasia: A Lesion-Symptom Mapping Study.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2023 Oct 31;4(4):550-574. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00117. eCollection 2023.
8
Differences in resting state functional connectivity relative to multiple sclerosis and impaired information processing speed.
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 19;14:1250894. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1250894. eCollection 2023.
10
Canonical Sentence Processing and the Inferior Frontal Cortex: Is There a Connection?
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Apr 13;3(2):318-344. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00067. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The Cortical Organization of Syntax.
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 14;30(3):1481-1498. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz180.
2
Cortical and structural-connectivity damage correlated with impaired syntactic processing in aphasia.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 May;40(7):2153-2173. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24514. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
Estimating effects of graded white matter damage and binary tract disconnection on post-stroke language impairment.
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
4
Anatomy of aphasia revisited.
Brain. 2018 Mar 1;141(3):848-862. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx363.
5
The Neurobiology of Agrammatic Sentence Comprehension: A Lesion Study.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Feb;30(2):234-255. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01200. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
6
Lesion localization of speech comprehension deficits in chronic aphasia.
Neurology. 2017 Mar 7;88(10):970-975. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003683. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
7
Revealing the dual streams of speech processing.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 27;113(52):15108-15113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614038114. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
8
Sentence processing selectivity in Broca's area: evident for structure but not syntactic movement.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2015;30(10):1326-1338. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1066831. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
9
Deficit-lesion correlations in syntactic comprehension in aphasia.
Brain Lang. 2016 Jan;152:14-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
10
The neurobiology of language beyond single words.
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:347-62. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013847. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验