Jovanovski Diana, Erb Suzanne, Zakzanis Konstantine K
University of Toronto, Life Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 Feb;27(2):189-204. doi: 10.1080/13803390490515694.
Studies on the neurocognitive effects of cocaine abuse are equivocal with respect to the specific types of deficits observed, although the vast majority of studies indicate that at least some deficits in certain broad functions such as attention, learning and memory, executive functions, and response speed exist. All of these studies based their results on null hypothesis statistical significance testing (NHSST). It is argued that effect size analysis, which provides information about the magnitude of difference, offers a more valid index of cognitive impairments in a population when compared to NHSST. Accordingly, the objective of the current study was to conduct an effect size analysis (or a meta-analysis in cases where the same test measure was utilized in more than one study) to determine the type and the magnitude of the specific cognitive deficits found as a result of cocaine use. Effect sizes were calculated for each test variable across 15 empirical studies that met inclusion criteria. The results from 481 cocaine users and 586 healthy normal controls revealed that cocaine use had the largest effect on several measures of attention (0.40 < d < 1.10). Moderate to large effect sizes (d > 0.50) were also obtained on tests of visual memory and working memory. Minimal effect sizes (d < 0.30) were obtained on tests of verbal fluency and other language functions and sensory-perceptual functions. Tests of executive functioning produced mixed findings and were interpreted in terms of degree rather than nature of impairment. The results are consistent with findings from neuroimaging and neurochemical studies that have found cocaine use to be associated with dysfunctions in the anterior cingulate gyrus and orbitofrontal cortex; these regions are highly implicated in the mediation of attentional and executive functions, respectively. Methodological limitations of the empirical studies included in the analysis are discussed.
关于可卡因滥用的神经认知影响的研究,在所观察到的特定缺陷类型方面存在分歧,尽管绝大多数研究表明,在某些广泛功能(如注意力、学习和记忆、执行功能及反应速度)中至少存在一些缺陷。所有这些研究的结果均基于零假设统计显著性检验(NHSST)。有人认为,效应量分析能提供有关差异大小的信息,与NHSST相比,它能为人群中的认知障碍提供更有效的指标。因此,本研究的目的是进行效应量分析(若在多项研究中使用了相同的测试方法,则进行元分析),以确定因使用可卡因而发现的特定认知缺陷的类型和程度。对符合纳入标准的15项实证研究中的每个测试变量计算效应量。481名可卡因使用者和586名健康正常对照者的结果显示,使用可卡因对多项注意力测试的影响最大(0.40 < d < 1.10)。在视觉记忆和工作记忆测试中也获得了中等至较大的效应量(d > 0.50)。在语言流畅性及其他语言功能和感觉 - 知觉功能测试中获得的效应量最小(d < 0.30)。执行功能测试产生了混合结果,并根据损伤程度而非性质进行解释。这些结果与神经影像学和神经化学研究的结果一致,这些研究发现使用可卡因与前扣带回和眶额皮质功能障碍有关;这些区域分别与注意力和执行功能的调节密切相关。文中讨论了分析中所纳入实证研究的方法学局限性。