Suppr超能文献

采用免疫抑制及静脉注射免疫球蛋白治疗炎症性扩张型心肌病和(围)心肌炎。

Treatment of inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy and (peri)myocarditis with immunosuppression and i.v. immunoglobulins.

作者信息

Maisch Bernhard, Hufnagel Günther, Kölsch Susanne, Funck Rainer, Richter Annette, Rupp Heinz, Herzum Matthias, Pankuweit Sabine

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Herz. 2004 Sep;29(6):624-36. doi: 10.1007/s00059-004-2628-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Treatment objectives in inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMi), myocarditis (M) and peri(myo)carditis are 1) the elimination of inflammatory cells from the myocardium and pericardium, 2) the elimination or (second best) mitigation of B-cell products such as antibodies and immuncomplexes directed against cardiac epitopes such as sarcolemmal, fibrillary and mitochondrial epitopes, and 3) the eradication of the causative viral or microbial agent, if present.

ANTIPHLOGISTIC TREATMENT

A "non-specific" anti-inflammatory treatment in peri(myo)carditis can be carried out with antiphlogistics (NSAIDs preferably colchicine 1-3 mg/d) independent from the presence of the infective agent. In larger virus and bacteria negative effusions we recommend intrapericardial instillation of cristalloid triamcinolon (Volon A) at a dose of 500 mg/m(2), which should be left in place to have a sustained effect over at least 4 weeks. This will effectively prevent recurrences particularly when colchicine is added over a period of at least 3-6 months. Taking into account the 2004 ESC task force recommendations on the management of pericardial diseases the treatment recommendation for NSAIDs and colchicine can be classified as level of evidence A, indication class I, for intrapericardial triamcinolon instillation as level of evidence B, indication class IIa.

IMMUNOSUPPRESSION

In (immuno)histologically validated autoreactive (virus negative) myocarditis and DCMi double-blind randomized trials are lacking to demonstrate the superiority of immunosuppression over conventional heart failure management. The only published randomized and double-blind immunosuppression treatment trial (American Myocarditis Treatment Trial) was underpowered and did not distinguish viral from non-viral disease. It showed neither benefit nor harm of a combination of cyclosporin and prednisone. A number of retrospective analyses of immunosuppression in myocarditis showed some benefit of surrogate parameters (ejection fraction, exercise tolerance) but improvement under conventional heart failure treatment cannot be ruled out completely as the main cause for amelioration. ESETCID (European Study on the Epidemiology and Treatment of Cardiac Inflammatory Disease) is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controled three-armed trial with prednisolone and azathioprine for autoreactive (virus negative) DCMi, interferon alpha for enterovirus positive DCMi, high-dose immunoglobulin for cytomegalovirus and intermediate dose for adeno- and Parvo B19 DCMi. It has now randomized more than 120 patients to the different treatment arms. Its final result has still to be awaited.-Patients not willing to randomize in the trial were included in a registry follow-up, which shows improvement of hemodynamic parameters and elimination of the inflammation in the majority of patients. This is in concordance with several non-randomized trials. Since evidence is conflicting (level of evidence C, indication class IIb; if negative viral etiology is taken into consideration class IIa) treatment with immunosuppression cannot be generally recommended but should be further evaluated in doubleblind randomized clinical trials or at least in controlled trials and registries. This also applies to treatment with interferon for enteroviral or other viral infections in the heart.

IMMUNOADSORPTION

: The elimination of anticardiac antibodies, which have been associated with DCMi, is a currently discussed concept, which is supported by published registry data and a few very small controlled investigations but not by a randomized double-blind trial with clinical endpoints of relevance. In some studies immunoglobulins have been substituted, so that an additional immunomodulatory effect has to be taken into account. The current proof of concept can be ranked level of evidence C, indication class IIa only. An even more challenging and still more attractive hypothesis is that cardiac inflammation caused by specific circulating beta-adrenoceptor antibodies can be eradicated with the elimination of the beta-receptor antibody thus healing dilated cardiomyopathy. Application of this approach can be ranked level of evidence C, indication class IIb at present only. Therefore these two pathophysiologically attractive concepts have to await further validation by a double-blind, randomized clinical endpoint trial.

IMMUNOGLOBULIN TREATMENT

It has been shown that immunoglobulins have both an antiviral and an anti-inflammatory effect. They may suppress proinflammatory cytokines and reduce oxidative stress. HIGH-DOSE I.V.

IMMUNOGLOBULINS (IVIG): In biopsy proven CMVmyocarditis a controlled trial demonstrated eradication of inflammation and of the virus (level of evidence B, indication class IIa), which is in accordance with registry data and case reports. In suspected myocarditis (not biopsy proven, no viral etiology established or excluded) conflicting data exist with respect to the improvement of surrogate markers such as the ejection fraction under high-dose immunoglobulins. More evidence can be weighted in favour of a positive treatment effect (level of evidence B, indication class IIb). Importantly there were no detrimental effects of the ivIG reported in these trials. One has to consider the high costs of this treatment, however. A trial taking into account the different etiologies (different viruses assessed separately vs. non-viral/autoreactive vs. placebo) is still lacking. MODERATE-DOSE I.V.

IMMUNOGLOBULINS

Registry data support a positive effect of 20 g i.v. pentaglobin (IgG and IgM) in adenovirus positive myocarditis for clinical improvement, eradication of both the inflammation and the virus. In Parvo B19 myocarditis our own registry data indicate that clinical improvement can be noted, but only inflammation is successfully eliminated, whereas Parvo B19 persistence remains a problem in the majority of patients. In Parvo B19 associated DCMi therefore dose finding studies and randomized trials are needed.

摘要

目标

炎症性扩张型心肌病(DCMi)、心肌炎(M)和心包(心肌)炎的治疗目标为:1)清除心肌和心包中的炎症细胞;2)清除或(次优方案)减轻B细胞产物,如针对心脏表位(如肌膜、纤维和线粒体表位)的抗体和免疫复合物;3)根除致病病毒或微生物病原体(若存在)。

抗炎治疗

心包(心肌)炎的“非特异性”抗炎治疗可使用抗炎药(非甾体抗炎药,优选秋水仙碱1 - 3mg/d),与是否存在感染病原体无关。对于较大的病毒及细菌阴性积液,我们建议心包内注射剂量为500mg/m²的晶体曲安奈德(沃龙A),应留置以产生至少持续4周的效果。这将有效预防复发,特别是在至少3 - 6个月的时间内加用秋水仙碱时。考虑到2004年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心包疾病管理工作组的建议,非甾体抗炎药和秋水仙碱的治疗建议可归类为证据水平A、适应证类别I,心包内注射曲安奈德的证据水平为B、适应证类别IIa。

免疫抑制

在经(免疫)组织学验证的自身反应性(病毒阴性)心肌炎和DCMi中,缺乏双盲随机试验来证明免疫抑制优于传统心力衰竭管理。唯一发表的随机双盲免疫抑制治疗试验(美国心肌炎治疗试验)样本量不足,且未区分病毒性与非病毒性疾病。该试验未显示环孢素和泼尼松联合使用的益处或危害。多项关于心肌炎免疫抑制的回顾性分析显示替代参数(射血分数、运动耐量)有一定益处,但不能完全排除传统心力衰竭治疗改善作为病情改善主要原因的可能性。欧洲心脏炎症性疾病流行病学与治疗研究(ESETCID)是一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的三臂试验,针对自身反应性(病毒阴性)DCMi使用泼尼松龙和硫唑嘌呤,针对肠道病毒阳性DCMi使用干扰素α,针对巨细胞病毒使用高剂量免疫球蛋白,针对腺病毒和细小病毒B19 DCMi使用中等剂量免疫球蛋白。目前已将120多名患者随机分配到不同治疗组。其最终结果仍有待观察。 - 不愿参加该试验随机分组的患者被纳入登记随访,结果显示大多数患者的血流动力学参数有所改善且炎症消除。这与多项非随机试验结果一致。由于证据相互矛盾(证据水平C、适应证类别IIb;若考虑阴性病毒病因则为类别IIa),免疫抑制治疗一般不被推荐,但应在双盲随机临床试验或至少在对照试验和登记研究中进一步评估。这也适用于用干扰素治疗心脏的肠道病毒或其他病毒感染。

免疫吸附

清除与DCMi相关的抗心脏抗体是目前正在讨论的一个概念,已发表的登记数据和一些非常小的对照研究支持这一概念,但尚无具有相关临床终点的随机双盲试验支持。在一些研究中,免疫球蛋白已被替代,因此必须考虑额外的免疫调节作用。目前的概念验证证据仅可归类为证据水平C、适应证类别IIa。一个更具挑战性且更具吸引力的假设是,通过消除β受体抗体可根除由特定循环β肾上腺素能受体抗体引起的心脏炎症,从而治愈扩张型心肌病。目前这种方法的应用证据水平仅为C、适应证类别IIb。因此,这两个具有病理生理学吸引力的概念必须等待双盲随机临床终点试验的进一步验证。

免疫球蛋白治疗

已表明免疫球蛋白具有抗病毒和抗炎作用。它们可能抑制促炎细胞因子并减少氧化应激。

高剂量静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG):在活检证实的巨细胞病毒心肌炎的一项对照试验中,证明炎症和病毒均被根除(证据水平B、适应证类别IIa),这与登记数据和病例报告一致。在疑似心肌炎(未活检证实,未确定或排除病毒病因)中,关于高剂量免疫球蛋白治疗下替代标志物如射血分数的改善存在相互矛盾的数据。更多证据倾向于积极的治疗效果(证据水平B、适应证类别IIb)。重要的是,这些试验中未报告静脉注射免疫球蛋白有有害影响。然而,必须考虑这种治疗的高成本。目前仍缺乏一项考虑不同病因(分别评估不同病毒与非病毒/自身反应性与安慰剂)的试验。

中等剂量静脉注射免疫球蛋白

登记数据支持静脉注射20g丙种球蛋白(IgG和IgM)对腺病毒阳性心肌炎的临床改善、炎症和病毒根除具有积极作用。在细小病毒B19心肌炎中,我们自己的登记数据表明可观察到临床改善,但仅炎症被成功消除,而细小病毒B19持续存在仍是大多数患者的问题。因此,在细小病毒B19相关的DCMi中需要进行剂量探索研究和随机试验。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验