• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次肾绞痛发作后立即进行体外冲击波碎石术治疗与输尿管结石清除加速相关。

Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment after a first colic episode correlates with accelerated ureteral stone clearance.

作者信息

Seitz Christian, Fajković Harun, Remzi Mesut, Waldert Matthias, Ozsoy Mehmet, Kramer Gero, Marberger Michael

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2006 Jun;49(6):1099-105; discussion 1105-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.003. Epub 2005 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.003
PMID:16413098
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship between delay in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) after a first colic and subsequent time to complete stone clearance.

METHODS

This prospective, non-randomized study included 94 patients treated with ESWL for unilateral solitary proximal ureteral stones after at least one episode of colic pain. Time between the first onset of colic pain and ESWL and stone clearance was recorded. The pretherapeutic degree of hydronephrosis has been assessed using ultrasound.

RESULTS

Mean stone size was 7.9 +/- 2.3 mm and mean time before ESWL after a first colic was 93.4 +/- 143.5 h. At 3 months, 3 patients were lost to follow-up. In 76.9% of patients stones were completely cleared and a further 3.3% harbored residual fragments < or =3 mm. Delay in treatment after a first colic correlated with subsequent time to stone clearance (p < 0.0001). Mean time to stone clearance in patients treated within 24h was 6.4 +/- 6.3 days compared with 16.0 +/- 17.8 days for those treated later (p = 0.008). Maximum stone diameter correlated with time to stone clearance (p = 0.031), but the degree of hydronephrosis did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid ESWL after a first onset of colic pain resulted in accelerated stone clearance independent of the degree of hydronephrosis but had no impact on the need for auxiliary procedures.

摘要

目的

探讨首次肾绞痛发作后体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)延迟与后续结石完全清除时间之间的关系。

方法

这项前瞻性、非随机研究纳入了94例在至少一次肾绞痛发作后接受ESWL治疗单侧孤立性近端输尿管结石的患者。记录首次肾绞痛发作至ESWL及结石清除的时间。术前使用超声评估肾积水程度。

结果

平均结石大小为7.9±2.3mm,首次肾绞痛发作后至ESWL的平均时间为93.4±143.5小时。3个月时,3例患者失访。76.9%的患者结石完全清除,另有3.3%的患者残留碎片≤3mm。首次肾绞痛发作后治疗延迟与后续结石清除时间相关(p<0.0001)。24小时内接受治疗的患者结石清除平均时间为6.4±6.3天,而稍后接受治疗的患者为16.0±17.8天(p=0.008)。结石最大直径与结石清除时间相关(p=0.031),但肾积水程度与之无关。

结论

首次肾绞痛发作后快速进行ESWL可加快结石清除,且与肾积水程度无关,但对辅助治疗的需求无影响。

相似文献

1
Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment after a first colic episode correlates with accelerated ureteral stone clearance.首次肾绞痛发作后立即进行体外冲击波碎石术治疗与输尿管结石清除加速相关。
Eur Urol. 2006 Jun;49(6):1099-105; discussion 1105-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.003. Epub 2005 Dec 28.
2
Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi in colic versus noncolic patients.急性与非急性患者近端输尿管结石的快速体外冲击波碎石术
Eur Urol. 2007 Oct;52(4):1223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: Does the presence and degree of hydronephrosis affect success?体外冲击波碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石:肾积水的存在及程度是否会影响治疗成功率?
Eur Urol. 2006 Feb;49(2):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.022. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
4
Does degree of hydronephrosis affect success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones?肾积水程度会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的成功率吗?
Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.010.
5
Impact of hydronephrosis on treatment outcome of solitary proximal ureteral stone after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.肾积水对体外冲击波碎石术后孤立性近端输尿管结石治疗效果的影响。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008 Oct;24(10):507-13. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70009-9.
6
Prospective randomized evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) on the short-time outcome of symptomatic ureteral stones.急诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对有症状输尿管结石短期疗效的前瞻性随机评估
Eur Urol. 2005 Jun;47(6):855-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.006. Epub 2005 Mar 17.
7
Evaluation of a synchronous twin-pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: the first prospective clinical study.冲击波碎石术同步双脉冲技术的评估:首例前瞻性临床研究。
BJU Int. 2005 Feb;95(3):389-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05306.x.
8
Efficacy of tamsulosin with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for passage of renal and ureteral calculi.坦索罗辛联合体外冲击波碎石术促进肾和输尿管结石排出的疗效
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 May;42(5):692-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K546. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
9
Ureteral stone location at emergency room presentation with colic.输尿管结石在急诊科表现为绞痛时的位置。
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.131. Epub 2009 May 17.
10
[Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases].[冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石——单机构661例连续病例经验]
Harefuah. 2005 Sep;144(9):605-8, 680, 679.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of early extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of 5 to 10 mm upper ureteral stones: An observational study.早期体外冲击波碎石术治疗 5 至 10 毫米上段输尿管结石的疗效:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 26;103(30):e39103. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039103.
2
Efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效:Meta 分析。
BMC Urol. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01226-5.
3
Development and validation of a predictive model for treatment outcome after emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with symptomatic ureteral stones during the COVID-19 pandemic: in a large prospective cohort.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对有症状的输尿管结石患者行急诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗结局的预测模型的开发和验证:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec 31;51(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01401-7.
4
The efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for symptomatic ureteral stones: Predictors of treatment failure without the assistance of computed tomography.体外冲击波碎石术治疗有症状输尿管结石的疗效:无需计算机断层扫描辅助的治疗失败预测因素
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0184855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184855. eCollection 2017.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success.输尿管下段结石的体外冲击波碎石术:治疗结果及成功标准
Arab J Urol. 2011 Mar;9(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 May 6.
6
Impact of colic pain as a significant factor for predicting the stone free rate of one-session shock wave lithotripsy for treating ureter stones: a Bayesian logistic regression model analysis.绞痛疼痛作为预测输尿管结石单次冲击波碎石术结石清除率的重要因素的影响:贝叶斯逻辑回归模型分析
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0123800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123800. eCollection 2015.
7
Factors predicting success of emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eESWL) in ureteric calculi--a single centre experience from the United Kingdom (UK).预测急诊体外冲击波碎石术(eESWL)治疗输尿管结石成功的因素——来自英国(UK)的单中心经验。
Urolithiasis. 2013 Oct;41(5):437-41. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0580-9. Epub 2013 Jun 9.
8
Usefulness of early extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in colic patients with ureteral stones.早期体外冲击波碎石术在输尿管结石绞痛患者中的应用价值
Korean J Urol. 2012 Dec;53(12):853-9. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.12.853. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
9
Immediate or delayed SWL in ureteric stones: a prospective and randomized study.输尿管结石的即刻或延迟体外冲击波碎石术:一项前瞻性随机研究
Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):739-44. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0490-2. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
10
Urgent shock wave lithotripsy as first-line treatment for ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of 570 patients.紧急冲击波碎石术作为输尿管结石的一线治疗方法:对570例患者的荟萃分析
Urol Res. 2012 Dec;40(6):725-31. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0484-0. Epub 2012 Jun 15.