Suppr超能文献

注意缺陷多动障碍与学习障碍的共病情况:对一个临床转诊样本的综述与报告

Comorbidity between ADDH and learning disability: a review and report in a clinically referred sample.

作者信息

Semrud-Clikeman M, Biederman J, Sprich-Buckminster S, Lehman B K, Faraone S V, Norman D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1992 May;31(3):439-48. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199205000-00009.

Abstract

A widely variable overlap ranging from 10 to 92% has been reported in the literature between attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADDH) and learning disability (LD), most likely a result of inconsistencies in the criteria used to define LD in different studies. The following study seeks to more accurately determine rates of LD in clinically referred children. Using a psychometrically reliable methodological approach, it was expected that the rate of LD in ADDH children would be far more modest than previously reported. Subjects were referred children with ADDH (N = 60), children with academic problems (N = 30), and normal controls (N = 36) of both sexes with available psychological and achievement testing. Using a liberal definition of LD, significant differences were found between the groups (ADDH = 38% versus academic problems = 43% versus normals = 8%; p = 0.002). In contrast, more modest rates were found using two more stringent methods of assessment (23 and 17%; 10 and 3%; 2 and 0%, respectively; p = 0.02). Arithmetic-based LD appears to be equally identified by both stringent methods, whereas the liberal definition overidentified children in all three groups. These findings show that a liberal definition of LD overidentifies LD not only in ADDH children but also in normal children.

摘要

文献报道注意缺陷多动障碍(ADDH)与学习障碍(LD)之间的重叠率差异很大,在10%至92%之间,这很可能是不同研究中用于定义LD的标准不一致所致。以下研究旨在更准确地确定临床转诊儿童中LD的发生率。采用心理测量学上可靠的方法,预计ADDH儿童中LD的发生率将比之前报道的要低得多。研究对象为转诊的ADDH儿童(N = 60)、有学习问题的儿童(N = 30)以及有可用心理和学业测试结果的正常对照组儿童(N = 36),涵盖了不同性别。采用宽松的LD定义时,发现各组之间存在显著差异(ADDH = 38%,有学习问题儿童 = 43%,正常儿童 = 8%;p = 0.002)。相比之下,使用另外两种更严格的评估方法时,发生率则较低(分别为23%和17%;10%和3%;2%和0%;p = 0.02)。基于算术的LD在两种严格方法中被识别的情况似乎相同,而宽松定义在所有三组中都过度识别了儿童。这些发现表明,宽松的LD定义不仅在ADDH儿童中过度识别LD,在正常儿童中也是如此。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验