Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Doehring W
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hospital of Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):264-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch559.
A complete evaluation strategy had been developed for thoracic X-ray imaging. It has been validated by investigating five chest-radiography systems, two of these systems after optimising image processing. The systems were a screen-film combination, a selenium drum, a conventional and a transparent imaging plate and a Cs/I-based flat panel detector (the two latter ones have been optimised using different post processing). At first all detectors have been characterised using physical parameters like DQE and MTF. After that all systems have been evaluated by human observer studies using anatomy in clinical images (VGA, ICS) and added pathological structures in thoracic phantom images (ROC). The ranking of the image quality of the systems was nearly the same in all studies. There was a similar assessment of main image quality parameters like spatial resolution, dynamic range and MTF. The modification of image post processing changed the visibility of pathological structures more than the visualisation of the anatomical criteria. The assessment of the clinical image quality has to be done for anatomical structures, and the recognition of pathological structures has to be evaluated.
已经开发出一种用于胸部X光成像的完整评估策略。通过对五个胸部射线照相系统进行研究,该策略得到了验证,其中两个系统在优化图像处理后进行了研究。这些系统包括一个屏-片组合系统、一个硒鼓系统、一个传统成像板和一个透明成像板以及一个基于Cs/I的平板探测器(后两者使用不同的后处理进行了优化)。首先,使用诸如DQE和MTF等物理参数对所有探测器进行了表征。之后,通过人体观察者研究,利用临床图像中的解剖结构(VGA、ICS)以及胸部体模图像中添加的病理结构(ROC)对所有系统进行了评估。在所有研究中,系统图像质量的排名几乎相同。对于空间分辨率、动态范围和MTF等主要图像质量参数也有类似的评估。图像后处理的修改对病理结构可见性的改变大于对解剖学标准可视化的改变。必须针对解剖结构进行临床图像质量评估,并且必须评估病理结构的识别情况。