• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量认知障碍者及其家庭照顾者日常护理的价值观和偏好。

Measuring the values and preferences for everyday care of persons with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers.

作者信息

Whitlatch Carol J, Feinberg Lynn Friss, Tucke Shandra S

机构信息

The Margaret Blenkner Research Institute, Benjamin Rose, 850 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1100, Cleveland, OH 44114, USA.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2005 Jun;45(3):370-80. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.3.370.

DOI:10.1093/geront/45.3.370
PMID:15933277
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study describes the development and psychometric properties of a 24-item scale to be used in both research and practice settings that assesses the everyday care values and preferences of individuals with cognitive impairment and the perceptions of family caregivers about their relative's values and preferences for care.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The Values and Preferences Scale was developed on the basis of previous measures used with cognitively intact samples with additional items generated by the authors in consultation with an advisory committee of practitioners, researchers, family caregivers, and persons with cognitive impairment. Individuals with mild to moderate cognitive impairment and their family caregivers (n = 111) were interviewed for the study.

RESULTS

Results of a factor analysis determined that the Values and Preferences Scale can be divided into two domains or subscales for persons with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers (i.e., Environment-Social Network and Personal Autonomy). These domains were found to have good internal consistency for both the individuals and their caregivers (Cronbach's alphas ranged from.70 to.82). Evidence of their psychometric properties compared with measures of depression, quality of life, and involvement in decision making was also found.

IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest that persons with cognitive impairment are able to express values and preferences about care they currently receive or will need in the future. Further application and testing of the Values and Preferences Scale should prove useful to practitioners who assist those with cognitive impairment and their caregivers with daily care decisions and the development of care plans.

摘要

目的

本研究描述了一个24项量表的开发及其心理测量特性,该量表可用于研究和实践环境,以评估认知障碍患者的日常护理价值观和偏好,以及家庭照顾者对其亲属护理价值观和偏好的认知。

设计与方法

价值观与偏好量表是在先前用于认知功能完好样本的测量方法基础上开发的,作者还与从业者、研究人员、家庭照顾者和认知障碍患者组成的咨询委员会协商,增加了一些项目。对轻度至中度认知障碍患者及其家庭照顾者(n = 111)进行了访谈研究。

结果

因子分析结果表明,价值观与偏好量表可分为认知障碍患者及其家庭照顾者的两个领域或子量表(即环境-社会网络和个人自主性)。发现这些领域对于患者及其照顾者都具有良好的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数范围为0.70至0.82)。还发现了与抑郁、生活质量和参与决策测量相比的心理测量特性证据。

启示

这些发现表明,认知障碍患者能够表达他们对当前接受或未来需要的护理的价值观和偏好。价值观与偏好量表的进一步应用和测试对协助认知障碍患者及其照顾者进行日常护理决策和制定护理计划的从业者应是有用的。

相似文献

1
Measuring the values and preferences for everyday care of persons with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers.衡量认知障碍者及其家庭照顾者日常护理的价值观和偏好。
Gerontologist. 2005 Jun;45(3):370-80. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.3.370.
2
Are persons with cognitive impairment able to state consistent choices?认知障碍患者能够做出一致的选择吗?
Gerontologist. 2001 Jun;41(3):374-82. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.3.374.
3
Decision-making for persons with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers.认知障碍者及其家庭照顾者的决策制定。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2002 Jul-Aug;17(4):237-44. doi: 10.1177/153331750201700406.
4
Differences in Assessment of Everyday Preferences Between People With Cognitive Impairment and Their Care Partners: The Role of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms.认知障碍患者及其照护者日常偏好评估的差异:神经精神症状的作用。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;28(10):1070-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.01.189. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
5
Psychometric assessment of the depressive cognition scale in caregivers of persons with dementia.痴呆患者照顾者抑郁认知量表的心理评估。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2013 Sep;34(9):678-84. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2013.794180.
6
Quality of life in patients with cognitive impairment: validation of the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease scale in Portugal.认知障碍患者的生活质量:葡萄牙阿尔茨海默病生活质量量表的验证。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Jul;25(7):1085-96. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000379. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
7
8
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
9
Psychometric assessment of the depressive cognition scale among caregivers of persons with autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍患者照顾者抑郁认知量表的心理测量评估。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2013 Apr;27(2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
10
Translation and Testing of the Italian Version of FAMCARE-2: Measuring Family Caregivers' Satisfaction With Palliative Care.FAMCARE-2 意大利版的翻译与测试:测量姑息治疗中家庭护理者的满意度。
J Fam Nurs. 2017 May;23(2):252-272. doi: 10.1177/1074840717697538. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful Care Conferences: Nursing Home Staff, Persons with Dementia, and Caregiver Perspectives.成功的护理会议:养老院工作人员、痴呆症患者及护理人员的观点
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Apr;26(4):105504. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105504. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
A visual approach to facilitating conversations about supportive care options in the context of cognitive impairment.一种在认知障碍背景下促进关于支持性护理方案的对话的可视化方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Sep;157:104691. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104691. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
Advance Care Planning in the Context of Dementia: Defining Concordance.
痴呆症背景下的预先医疗指示规划:定义一致性。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jun 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae029.
4
Promoting Advance Care Planning for Persons with Dementia: Study Protocol for the LEAD (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and Other Dementias) Clinical Trial.促进痴呆症患者的预先护理计划:LEAD(早期阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症患者的生命规划)临床试验研究方案。
OBM Integr Compliment Med. 2023;8(1). doi: 10.21926/obm.icm.2301004. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
5
Supportive care decision-making processes of persons with dementia and their caregivers.痴呆症患者及其照顾者的支持性护理决策过程。
Dementia (London). 2023 Nov;22(8):1695-1717. doi: 10.1177/14713012231193139. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
6
Health Disparities in Advance Care Planning: Development of a Spanish-Language LEAD Guide (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and Other Dementias).晚期护理计划中的健康差异:西班牙语LEAD指南(早发性阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症的生命规划)的制定。
Health Equity. 2023 Aug 25;7(1):430-438. doi: 10.1089/heq.2022.0143. eCollection 2023.
7
Shared Decision Making for Elective Surgical Procedures in Older Adults with and without Cognitive Insufficiencies.老年认知功能正常与认知功能缺陷患者择期手术的共享决策制定。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Aug;43(6):656-666. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231182436. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
8
Discrepancies in dyadic coping: associations with distress and quality of life in couples facing early stage dementia.二元应对中的差异:与早期痴呆症夫妇的痛苦和生活质量的关联
Front Psychol. 2023 May 24;14:1056428. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1056428. eCollection 2023.
9
Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes.养老院监控技术使用中的算法危害与数字时代歧视
Front Sociol. 2022 Sep 16;7:957246. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.957246. eCollection 2022.
10
Control Matters in Elder Care Technology:: Evidence and Direction for Designing It In.老年护理技术中的控制问题:设计中的证据与方向
DIS (Des Interact Syst Conf). 2022 Jun;2022:1831-1848. doi: 10.1145/3532106.3533471. Epub 2022 Jun 13.