Suppr超能文献

老年认知功能正常与认知功能缺陷患者择期手术的共享决策制定。

Shared Decision Making for Elective Surgical Procedures in Older Adults with and without Cognitive Insufficiencies.

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2023 Aug;43(6):656-666. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231182436. Epub 2023 Jul 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Older adults are prone to cognitive impairment, which may affect their ability to engage in aspects of shared decision making (SDM) and their ability to complete surveys about the SDM process. This study examined the surgical decision-making processes of older adults with and without cognitive insufficiencies and evaluated the psychometric properties of the SDM Process scale.

METHODS

Eligible patients were 65 y or older and scheduled for a preoperative appointment before elective surgery (e.g., arthroplasty). One week before the visit, staff contacted patients via phone to administer the baseline survey, including the SDM Process scale (range 0-4), SURE scale (top scored), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test version 8.1 BLIND English (MoCA-blind; score range 0-22; scores < 19 indicate cognitive insufficiency). Patients completed a follow-up survey 3 mo after their visit to assess decision regret (top scored) and retest reliability for the SDM Process scale.

RESULTS

Twenty-six percent (127/488) of eligible patients completed the survey; 121 were included in the analytic data set, and 85 provided sufficient follow-up data. Forty percent of patients ( = 49/121) had MoCA-blind scores indicating cognitive insufficiencies. Overall SDM Process scores did not differ by cognitive status (intact cognition  = 2.5,  = 1.0 v. cognitive insufficiencies  = 2.5,  = 1.0;  = 0.80). SURE top scores were similar across groups (83% intact cognition v. 90% cognitive insufficiencies;  = 0.43). While patients with intact cognition had less regret, the difference was not statistically significant (92% intact cognition v. 79% cognitive insufficiencies;  = 0.10). SDM Process scores had low missing data and good retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Reported SDM, decisional conflict, and decision regret did not differ significantly for patients with and without cognitive insufficiencies. The SDM Process scale was an acceptable, reliable, and valid measure of SDM in patients with and without cognitive insufficiencies.

HIGHLIGHTS

Forty percent of patients 65 y or older who were scheduled for elective surgery had scores indicative of cognitive insufficiencies.Patient-reported shared decision making, decisional conflict, and decision regret did not differ significantly for patients with and without cognitive insufficiencies.The Shared Decision Making Process scale was an acceptable, reliable, and valid measure of shared decision making in patients with and without cognitive insufficiencies.

摘要

目的

老年人易发生认知障碍,这可能会影响他们参与共享决策(SDM)的能力,以及他们完成有关 SDM 过程的调查的能力。本研究检查了认知功能正常和认知功能不足的老年人的手术决策过程,并评估了 SDM 过程量表的心理测量特性。

方法

符合条件的患者为 65 岁或以上,在择期手术(如关节置换术)前进行术前预约。在就诊前一周,工作人员通过电话联系患者,进行基线调查,包括 SDM 过程量表(范围 0-4)、SURE 量表(最高得分)和蒙特利尔认知评估测试 8.1 版 BLIND 英语(MoCA-blind;得分范围 0-22;得分 < 19 表示认知功能不足)。患者在就诊后 3 个月完成随访调查,以评估决策后悔(最高得分)和 SDM 过程量表的重测信度。

结果

26%(488 名合格患者中的 127 名)完成了调查;121 名患者纳入分析数据集,85 名患者提供了足够的随访数据。40%的患者( = 49/121)的 MoCA-blind 评分表明认知功能不足。总体 SDM 过程评分不因认知状态而异(认知正常 = 2.5, = 1.0 v. 认知功能不足 = 2.5, = 1.0; = 0.80)。各组的 SURE 最高得分相似(认知正常 83% v. 认知功能不足 90%; = 0.43)。尽管认知正常的患者后悔程度较低,但差异无统计学意义(认知正常 92% v. 认知功能不足 79%; = 0.10)。SDM 过程评分的缺失数据较少,重测信度良好(组内相关系数 = 0.7)。

结论

认知功能正常和认知功能不足患者的 SDM、决策冲突和决策后悔报告无显著差异。SDM 过程量表是一种可接受、可靠和有效的认知功能正常和不足患者 SDM 测量工具。

重点

计划接受择期手术的 65 岁及以上患者中,有 40%的患者认知功能不足。认知功能正常和认知功能不足患者的患者报告 SDM、决策冲突和决策后悔无显著差异。SDM 过程量表是一种可接受、可靠和有效的认知功能正常和不足患者 SDM 测量工具。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验