Suppr超能文献

人类体外受精胚胎3天培养期间四种培养基类型的比较。

Comparison of four media types during 3-day human IVF embryo culture.

作者信息

Aoki Vincent W, Wilcox Aaron L, Peterson C Matthew, Parker-Jones Kirtly, Hatasaka Harry H, Gibson Mark, Huang Ivan, Carrell Douglas T

机构信息

Andrology Laboratory, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 May;10(5):600-6. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61667-7.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of human tubal fluid (HTF), G1.2, Sage Cleavage and Life Global media for IVF outcome during 3-day culture of human embryos. A three-phase auto-controlled study was conducted in which IVF outcome was compared between (1) HTF and G1.2, (2) HTF and Cleavage, and (3) Cleavage and Life Global. In phase 1, no differences in embryo quality were observed between HTF and G1.2. However, embryos derived from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) displayed significantly improved quality when grown in HTF versus G1.2. No differences in pregnancy and implantation rates were observed in cases where embryos transferred were grown exclusively in HTF or G1.2 media. In phase 2, embryo quality was significantly improved for embryos cultured in Cleavage versus HTF media (P < 0.001). However, pregnancy, implantation and spontaneous abortion rates were similar between the two media. In phase 3, there were no differences in embryo quality, pregnancy, implantation, and spontaneous abortion rates between Cleavage and Life Global media. Overall, the data indicate that Life Global and Cleavage media yield similar results in a 3-day IVF culture programme. Cleavage medium is superior to HTF, as evidenced by significantly improved embryo quality (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, HTF medium is superior to G1.2 for ICSI cases.

摘要

本研究旨在比较人输卵管液(HTF)、G1.2、Sage Cleavage和Life Global培养基在人胚胎3天培养期对体外受精结局的有效性。进行了一项三阶段自身对照研究,比较了(1)HTF和G1.2、(2)HTF和Cleavage、(3)Cleavage和Life Global之间的体外受精结局。在第1阶段,HTF和G1.2之间未观察到胚胎质量差异。然而,与在G1.2中培养相比,卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)获得的胚胎在HTF中生长时质量显著提高。在仅在HTF或G1.2培养基中培养的胚胎移植病例中,未观察到妊娠率和着床率的差异。在第2阶段,与HTF培养基相比,在Cleavage培养基中培养的胚胎质量显著提高(P<0.001)。然而,两种培养基之间的妊娠、着床和自然流产率相似。在第3阶段,Cleavage和Life Global培养基之间的胚胎质量、妊娠、着床和自然流产率没有差异。总体而言,数据表明Life Global和Cleavage培养基在3天体外受精培养方案中产生相似的结果。Cleavage培养基优于HTF,胚胎质量显著提高证明了这一点(P<0.001)。同时,对于ICSI病例,HTF培养基优于G1.2。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验