Nollet Nathalie, Maes Dominiek, Duchateau Luc, Hautekiet Veerle, Houf Kurt, Van Hoof Jan, De Zuttera Lieven, De Kruif Aart, Geers Rony
Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Vet Res. 2005 Jul-Aug;36(4):545-55. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2005014.
Most Salmonella control programmes are based on serological testing in the slaughterhouse. However, from a point of view of carcass contamination, it is rather the presence of Salmonella spp. in the animal at the time of slaughter that is important. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the possible discrepancies between the isolation of Salmonella spp. in the mesenteric lymph nodes and the results of serological screening. In total, 1821 fattening pigs originating from 60 Belgian farrow-to-finish herds were sampled in the slaughterhouse. The serum samples were analysed using an indirect mix-ELISA for the presence of Salmonella antibodies and evaluated at 3 cut-off values namely 10, 20, and 40% Optical Density (OD). All mesenteric lymph node samples were submitted to qualitative Salmonella isolation and a representative number of isolates was serotyped. From each herd, 30 animals were screened both serologically and bacteriologically and the herd was considered as positive when at least one sample was positive. At the herd level, 83.6% (cut-off OD 40%) to 100.0% (cut-off OD 10%) of the herds from which Salmonella had been isolated were evaluated as seropositive. At the individual level, only 34.5% (cut-off OD 40%) to 82.8% (cut-off OD 10%) of the animals from which Salmonella had been isolated were seropositive. Overall, a weak agreement was found between bacteriology and serology for Salmonella diagnosis. If pig herds are categorised using serological tests in the slaughterhouse, one should be aware of the fact that slaughter pigs can still harbour Salmonella spp. in the mesenteric lymph nodes, without being detected in serological tests. The cut-off value used to evaluate a sample as serologically positive and the number of samples per herd are of major importance to classify herds correctly in order to protect human health.
大多数沙门氏菌控制计划都基于屠宰场的血清学检测。然而,从胴体污染的角度来看,屠宰时动物体内沙门氏菌属的存在才是至关重要的。这项横断面研究的目的是调查肠系膜淋巴结中沙门氏菌属的分离结果与血清学筛查结果之间可能存在的差异。总共从比利时60个从仔猪到育肥猪的养殖场选取了1821头育肥猪在屠宰场进行采样。血清样本采用间接混合ELISA法分析沙门氏菌抗体的存在情况,并在3个临界值(即光密度(OD)为10%、20%和40%)下进行评估。所有肠系膜淋巴结样本都进行了沙门氏菌定性分离,并对代表性数量的分离株进行了血清分型。从每个养殖场选取30头猪进行血清学和细菌学筛查,当至少有一个样本呈阳性时,该养殖场被视为阳性。在养殖场层面,分离出沙门氏菌的养殖场中,83.6%(临界OD值40%)至100.0%(临界OD值10%)被评估为血清阳性。在个体层面,分离出沙门氏菌的动物中,只有34.5%(临界OD值40%)至82.8%(临界OD值10%)为血清阳性。总体而言,沙门氏菌诊断的细菌学和血清学之间一致性较弱。如果在屠宰场使用血清学检测对猪群进行分类,应该意识到屠宰猪的肠系膜淋巴结中仍可能携带沙门氏菌属,而在血清学检测中未被检测到。用于评估样本血清学阳性的临界值以及每个养殖场的样本数量对于正确分类猪群以保护人类健康至关重要。