• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour.

作者信息

Allen Victoria M, O'Connell Colleen M, Baskett Thomas F

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

BJOG. 2005 Jul;112(7):986-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00615.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00615.x
PMID:15958005
Abstract

To estimate maternal and perinatal morbidity associated with caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation, a population-based cohort study from 1997 to 2002 was used, which included 1623 nullipara with singleton pregnancies at 37-42 weeks of gestation requiring caesarean delivery in labour. Compared to caesarean delivery at less than full dilatation, women undergoing caesarean delivery at full dilatation were more likely to have complications of intraoperative trauma (RR 2.6, P < 0.001) and infants with perinatal asphyxia (RR 1.5, P < 0.05). There was no difference in maternal or perinatal morbidity when duration of the second stage of labour or when failed assisted vaginal delivery was considered.

摘要

相似文献

1
Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour.
BJOG. 2005 Jul;112(7):986-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00615.x.
2
Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity.宫颈完全扩张时剖宫产与第一产程剖宫产:母婴发病率比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Sep;278(3):245-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0548-5. Epub 2008 Jan 12.
3
Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care.第二产程手术分娩与产科护理标准的队列研究
BJOG. 2003 Jun;110(6):610-5.
4
[How long can we wait at full dilatation. A study of maternal and neonatal morbidity related to the duration of the second stage of labour in nulliparous women].[宫口全开后我们能等待多久。一项关于初产妇第二产程时长与母婴发病率相关性的研究]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 May;37(3):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.12.010. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
5
Planned caesarean section decreases the risk of adverse perinatal outcome due to both labour and delivery complications in the Term Breech Trial.在足月臀位试验中,计划剖宫产降低了因产程和分娩并发症导致的围产期不良结局的风险。
BJOG. 2004 Oct;111(10):1065-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00266.x.
6
Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.分娩第二阶段与第一阶段相比,经初次剖宫产的母婴结局比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;109(4):917-21. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe.
7
Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term.与足月引产相比,未临产剖宫产相关的孕产妇发病率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;108(2):286-94. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000215988.23224.e4.
8
Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend.足月时剖宫产率上升:一个令人担忧的趋势。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Aug;157(2):141-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
9
Outcome of term breech births: 10-year experience at a district general hospital.足月臀位分娩的结局:一家区级综合医院的10年经验
BJOG. 2005 Feb;112(2):218-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00323.x.
10
Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes following caesarean section in second versus first stage of labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.尼日利亚一家三级医院剖宫产术中第二产程与第一产程产妇及新生儿结局比较
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2011 Sep;18(3):165-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Second stage of labor beyond 4 h in nulliparous patients with epidural analgesia: implications and outcomes-a retrospective cohort.初产妇硬膜外镇痛下第二产程超过4小时:影响因素及结局——一项回顾性队列研究
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Aug 5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08141-0.
2
Maternal mortality due to obstetric hemorrhage by surgical injury during cesarean section: A nationwide study.剖宫产术中外科损伤导致的产科出血所致产妇死亡:一项全国性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Sep;103(9):1877-1887. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14917. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
3
Management of impacted fetal head at cesarean delivery.
剖宫产术中嵌顿胎头的处理
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S980-S987. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.037. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
4
The use of bubble charts in analyzing the global second-stage cesarean delivery rates: a systematic review.气泡图在分析全球第二阶段剖宫产率中的应用:一项系统综述。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Jan 19;4(1):100312. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100312. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Comparing adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in primary caesarean delivery during first versus second-stage of labour in Kenya: An institution-based cohort study.比较肯尼亚第一产程与第二产程行剖宫产术对母婴围生期结局的影响:一项基于机构的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0294266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294266. eCollection 2023.
6
A research agenda to improve incidence and outcomes of assisted vaginal birth.改善辅助阴道分娩发生率和结局的研究议程。
Bull World Health Organ. 2023 Nov 1;101(11):723-729. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.290140. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
7
Experiences of Impacted Foetal Head: Findings from a Pragmatic Focus Group Study of Mothers and Midwives.胎儿头部受影响的体验:来自母亲和助产士实用焦点小组研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 2;20(21):7009. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20217009.
8
Feasibility of a RCT of techniques for managing an impacted fetal head during emergency caesarean section: the MIDAS scoping study.一项关于在紧急剖宫产时处理胎头难产技术的 RCT 的可行性:MIDAS 范围研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Mar;27(6):1-87. doi: 10.3310/KUYP6832.
9
The acceptability and feasibility of a randomised trial exploring approaches to managing impacted fetal head during emergency caesarean section: a qualitative study.一项探索在紧急剖宫产中处理胎头难产方法的随机试验的可接受性和可行性:一项定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05444-5.
10
Interventions to reintroduce or increase assisted vaginal births: a systematic review of the literature.干预措施以重新引入或增加辅助阴道分娩:文献系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 14;13(2):e070640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070640.