Suppr超能文献

意见不一:退伍军人健康管理局临床实践指南的心智模式

Not of one mind: mental models of clinical practice guidelines in the Veterans Health Administration.

作者信息

Hysong Sylvia J, Best Richard G, Pugh Jacqueline A, Moore Frank I

机构信息

ALMD/South Texas Veterans Health Care System, 7400 Merton Minter Blvd. Ambulatory Care 11C6, San Antonio, TX 78229-4404, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2005 Jun;40(3):829-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00387.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to present differences in mental models of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) among 15 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities throughout the United States.

DATA SOURCES

Two hundred and forty-four employees from 15 different VHA facilities across four service networks around the country were invited to participate. Participants were selected from different levels throughout each service setting from primary care personnel to facility leadership.

STUDY DESIGN

This qualitative study used purposive sampling, a semistructured interview process for data collection, and grounded theory techniques for analysis.

DATA COLLECTION

A semistructured interview was used to collect information on participants' mental models of CPGs, as well as implementation strategies and barriers in their facility.

FINDINGS

Analysis of these interviews using grounded theory techniques indicated that there was wide variability in employees' mental models of CPGs. Findings also indicated that high-performing facilities exhibited both (a) a clear, focused shared mental model of guidelines and (b) a tendency to use performance feedback as a learning opportunity, thus suggesting that a shared mental model is a necessary but not sufficient step toward successful guideline implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that a clear shared mental model of guidelines, in combination with a learning orientation toward feedback are important components for successful guideline implementation and improved quality of care.

摘要

目的

本文旨在呈现美国各地15个退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)医疗机构在临床实践指南(CPG)心理模型上的差异。

数据来源

邀请了来自全国四个服务网络中15个不同VHA医疗机构的244名员工参与。参与者从每个服务机构的不同层级选取,包括基层医疗人员到机构领导。

研究设计

这项定性研究采用了目的抽样法、用于数据收集的半结构化访谈流程以及用于分析的扎根理论技术。

数据收集

采用半结构化访谈来收集关于参与者对CPG的心理模型以及其所在机构的实施策略和障碍的信息。

研究结果

运用扎根理论技术对这些访谈进行分析表明,员工对CPG的心理模型存在很大差异。研究结果还表明,高效能机构既展现出(a)清晰、聚焦的指南共享心理模型,又展现出(b)将绩效反馈用作学习机会的倾向,这表明共享心理模型是成功实施指南的必要但不充分条件。

结论

我们得出结论,清晰的指南共享心理模型,再加上对反馈的学习导向,是成功实施指南和提高护理质量的重要组成部分。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
The Importance of Mental Models in Implementation Science.心理模式在实施科学中的重要性。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;9:680316. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.680316. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验