Hysong Sylvia J, Best Richard G, Pugh Jacqueline A
Houston Center for Quality of Care & Utilization Studies, Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152), 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Feb;42(1 Pt 1):84-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00610.x.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mandated the system-wide implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in the mid-1990s, arming all facilities with basic resources to facilitate implementation; despite this resource allocation, significant variability still exists across VA facilities in implementation success.
This study compares CPG implementation strategy patterns used by high and low performing primary care clinics in the VA.
Descriptive, cross-sectional study of a purposeful sample of six Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) with high and low performance on six CPGs.
One hundred and two employees (management, quality improvement, clinic personnel) involved with guideline implementation at each VAMC primary care clinic. MEASURES; Participants reported specific strategies used by their facility to implement guidelines in 1-hour semi-structured interviews. Facilities were classified as high or low performers based on their guideline adherence scores calculated through independently conducted chart reviews.
High performing facilities (HPFs) (a) invested significantly in the implementation of the electronic medical record and locally adapting it to provider needs, (b) invested dedicated resources to guideline-related initiatives, and (c) exhibited a clear direction in their strategy choices. Low performing facilities exhibited (a) earlier stages of development for their electronic medical record, (b) reliance on preexisting resources for guideline implementation, with little local adaptation, and (c) no clear direction in their strategy choices.
A multifaceted, yet targeted, strategic approach to guideline implementation emphasizing dedicated resources and local adaptation may result in more successful implementation and higher guideline adherence than relying on standardized resources and taxing preexisting channels.
20世纪90年代中期,美国退伍军人事务部(VA)要求在全系统实施临床实践指南(CPG),为所有机构配备基本资源以促进实施;尽管进行了这种资源分配,但VA各机构在实施成功方面仍存在显著差异。
本研究比较了VA中初级保健诊所绩效高和低的诊所所采用的CPG实施策略模式。
对六个在六项CPG上表现高和低的退伍军人事务医疗中心(VAMC)进行有目的抽样的描述性横断面研究。
每个VAMC初级保健诊所中参与指南实施的102名员工(管理人员、质量改进人员、诊所工作人员)。
参与者在1小时的半结构化访谈中报告了其所在机构用于实施指南的具体策略。根据通过独立进行的病历审查计算出的指南依从性得分,将各机构分为高绩效或低绩效。
高绩效机构(HPF)(a)在电子病历的实施上投入大量资金,并使其根据提供者需求进行本地化调整,(b)为与指南相关的举措投入专门资源,(c)在战略选择上有明确方向。低绩效机构表现为(a)电子病历处于早期发展阶段,(b)在指南实施上依赖现有资源,几乎没有本地化调整,(c)在战略选择上没有明确方向。
与依赖标准化资源和利用现有渠道相比,采用强调专门资源和本地化调整的多方面但有针对性的战略方法来实施指南,可能会带来更成功的实施和更高的指南依从性。