• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在确定优先事项时纳入伦理考量:加拿大一个地区卫生委员会的案例研究。

Incorporating ethics in priority setting: a case study of a regional health board in Canada.

作者信息

Yeo M, Williams J R, Hooper W

机构信息

Canadian Medical Association.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 1999;7(2):177-94. doi: 10.1023/A:1009445306165.

DOI:10.1023/A:1009445306165
PMID:15968971
Abstract

The authors were involved in developing an ethical framework to assist the Queens Region Board (Prince Edward Island, Canada) set priorities in health and health care. Two and one half years after the adoption of this framework, the authors undertook an evaluation of the framework. This paper will discuss: (a) the historical background of regionalization in Canada, and in particular the circumstances leading up to the institution of regional boards in Prince Edward Island; (b) the sorts of ethical issues facing the Queens Regional Board; (c) issues arising in connection with the use and development of ethics frameworks for managing ethical issues in priority setting; (d) the framework adopted by the Queens Board and the process that led to its development; (e) issues arising as concerns implementation of the framework; (f) questions and issues pertinent to other boards and bodies considering similar initiatives.

摘要

作者参与了制定一个伦理框架,以协助皇后区委员会(加拿大爱德华王子岛)确定卫生与医疗保健方面的优先事项。在采用该框架两年半后,作者对其进行了评估。本文将讨论:(a)加拿大区域化的历史背景,尤其是导致爱德华王子岛设立区域委员会的情况;(b)皇后区区域委员会面临的各类伦理问题;(c)在使用和制定伦理框架以管理优先事项设定中的伦理问题时出现的问题;(d)皇后区委员会采用的框架及其制定过程;(e)框架实施过程中出现的问题;(f)与其他考虑类似举措的委员会和机构相关的问题。

相似文献

1
Incorporating ethics in priority setting: a case study of a regional health board in Canada.在确定优先事项时纳入伦理考量:加拿大一个地区卫生委员会的案例研究。
Health Care Anal. 1999;7(2):177-94. doi: 10.1023/A:1009445306165.
2
Ethics for regional boards.地区委员会的伦理规范。
Leadersh Health Serv. 1996 Jul-Aug;5(4):22-6.
3
SARS and hospital priority setting: a qualitative case study and evaluation.严重急性呼吸综合征与医院优先级设定:一项定性案例研究与评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec 19;4(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-36.
4
Brigadier-General, Hilary F. Jaeger, MD, CHE, Chair of CCHSE's Ethics Committee, answers the question: How can a health service leader, such as a Regional Health Authority Chief Executive Officer, ensure that he or she remains compliant with the College's Code of Ethics when faced with political or fiscal pressure leading to management decisions which, in the opinion of the leader, are likely to adversely affect real health outcomes?希拉里·F·耶格尔准将,医学博士,医学伦理学硕士,CCHSE伦理委员会主席,回答了以下问题:像地区卫生局首席执行官这样的医疗服务领导者,在面临政治或财政压力从而做出管理决策(而领导者认为这些决策可能会对实际健康结果产生不利影响)时,如何确保自己始终遵守该学会的道德准则?
Healthc Manage Forum. 2008 Autumn;21(3):44-5.
5
Priority dilemmas in psoriasis care and visions of a future care in a group of administrators, politicians and professionals in northern Sweden.瑞典北部一群管理人员、政治家和专业人士在银屑病护理中面临的优先级困境及对未来护理的展望。
Health Policy. 2008 Aug;87(2):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.01.005. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
6
A mandate for regional health ethics resources.对区域卫生伦理资源的一项要求。
HEC Forum. 2004 Dec;16(4):247-60. doi: 10.1007/s10730-005-7260-2.
7
Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success.医疗保健机构中的优先级设定:成功的标准、流程和参数
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Sep 8;4(1):25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-25.
8
Ethical issues in pandemic planning.大流行规划中的伦理问题。
Med J Aust. 2006 Nov 20;185(S10):S73-6. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00713.x.
9
Priority Setting Meets Multiple Streams: A Match to Be Further Examined? Comment on "Introducing New Priority Setting and Resource Allocation Processes in a Canadian Healthcare Organization: A Case Study Analysis Informed by Multiple Streams Theory.优先事项设定契合多源流理论:进一步检验的契合点?对“在加拿大医疗机构引入新的优先事项设定和资源配置流程:多源流理论视角下的案例分析”一文的评论
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Aug 1;5(8):497-499. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.58.
10
Pandemic influenza preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-making.大流行性流感防范:指导决策的伦理框架
BMC Med Ethics. 2006 Dec 4;7:E12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-7-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Doing 'Upstream' Priority-Setting for Global Health with Justice: Moving from Vision to Practice?以公正的方式为全球健康进行“上游”优先事项设定:从愿景走向实践?
Public Health Ethics. 2016 Jun 3;11(3):265-274. doi: 10.1093/phe/phw026. eCollection 2018 Nov.
2
Decision maker perceptions of resource allocation processes in Canadian health care organizations: a national survey.决策者对加拿大医疗机构资源配置流程的看法:一项全国性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 2;13:247. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-247.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics for regional boards.地区委员会的伦理规范。
Leadersh Health Serv. 1996 Jul-Aug;5(4):22-6.
2
Devolving authority for health care in Canada's provinces: 4. Emerging issues and prospects.加拿大各省医疗保健权力下放:4. 新出现的问题与前景。
CMAJ. 1997 Mar 15;156(6):817-23.
3
Devolving authority for health care in Canada's provinces: 1. An introduction to the issues.加拿大各省医疗保健权力下放:1. 问题介绍
CMAJ. 1997 Feb 1;156(3):371-7.