Verheijden Marieke W, Bakx J Carel, Delemarre Ine C G, Wanders Anne J, van Woudenbergh Nellie M, Bottema Ben Jam, van Weel Chris, van Staveren Wija A
Nutritionist, Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Jun;55(515):452-7.
The Stages of Change Model is increasingly used for lifestyle counselling. In general practice, the use of algorithms to measure stage of change is limited, but for successful counselling it is important to know patients' readiness to change.
To assess the accuracy of the assessment of patients' readiness to change fat consumption, physical activity, and smoking by GPs and general practice registrars.
Cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey.
One hundred and ninety-nine patients at elevated cardiovascular risk aged 40-70 years, 24 GPs, and 21 registrars in Dutch general practices.
Patients were asked to complete an algorithm to measure their motivation to change fat consumption, physical activity, and smoking. GPs and registrars were given descriptions of the stages of change for the three lifestyles, and were asked to indicate the description that matched their patient. Cohen's kappa was calculated as measure of agreement between patients and GPs/registrars.
Registrars' patients were younger, and less often overweight and hypertensive than GPs' patients. Cohen's kappa for smoking was moderate (0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34 to 0.67 for GPs and 0.47, CI = 0.27 to 0.68 for registrars). Agreement for fat and activity was poor to fair. No differences in accuracy were observed between GPs and registrars (P = 0.07-0.83).
Low accuracy indicates that counselling in general practice is often targeted at the wrong people at the wrong time. Improvements can possibly be achieved by making registration of lifestyle parameters in patient records common practice, and by simply asking patients where they stand in respect to lifestyle change.
改变阶段模型越来越多地用于生活方式咨询。在全科医疗中,使用算法来衡量改变阶段的情况有限,但对于成功的咨询而言,了解患者改变的意愿很重要。
评估全科医生和全科医疗住院医生对患者改变脂肪摄入、身体活动和吸烟习惯意愿评估的准确性。
基于问卷的横断面调查。
荷兰全科医疗中199名心血管疾病风险升高、年龄在40 - 70岁的患者、24名全科医生和21名住院医生。
要求患者完成一项算法,以衡量他们改变脂肪摄入、身体活动和吸烟习惯的动机。向全科医生和住院医生提供三种生活方式改变阶段的描述,并要求他们指出与自己患者相匹配的描述。计算科恩kappa系数作为患者与全科医生/住院医生之间一致性的度量。
住院医生的患者比全科医生的患者更年轻,超重和高血压的情况也更少。关于吸烟的科恩kappa系数为中等(全科医生为0.50,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.34至0.67;住院医生为0.47,CI = 0.27至0.68)。关于脂肪摄入和身体活动的一致性为差到一般。全科医生和住院医生之间在准确性上未观察到差异(P = 0.07 - 0.83)。
低准确性表明全科医疗中的咨询往往在错误的时间针对错误的人群。通过将生活方式参数记录在患者病历中成为常规做法,以及简单询问患者在生活方式改变方面的进展,可能会有所改善。