Suppr超能文献

使用呼吸性窦性心律不齐的时变分析评估分级和最大运动测试期间的通气阈值。

Assessment of ventilatory thresholds during graded and maximal exercise test using time varying analysis of respiratory sinus arrhythmia.

作者信息

Blain G, Meste O, Bouchard T, Bermon S

机构信息

Département Ergonomie Sportive et Performances, Universite de Toulon-Var, Nice, France.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2005 Jul;39(7):448-52; discussion 448-52. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2004.014134.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test whether ventilatory thresholds, measured during an exercise test, could be assessed using time varying analysis of respiratory sinus arrhythmia frequency (f(RSA)).

METHODS

Fourteen sedentary subjects and 12 endurance athletes performed a graded and maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer: initial load 75 W (sedentary subjects) and 150 W (athletes), increments 37.5 W/2 min. f(RSA) was extracted from heart period series using an evolutive model. First (T(V1)) and second (T(V2)) ventilatory thresholds were determined from the time course curves of ventilation and ventilatory equivalents for O(2) and CO(2).

RESULTS

f(RSA) was accurately extracted from all recordings and positively correlated to respiratory frequency (r = 0.96 (0.03), p<0.01). In 21 of the 26 subjects, two successive non-linear increases were determined in f(RSA), defining the first (T(RSA1)) and second (T(RSA2)) f(RSA) thresholds. When expressed as a function of power, T(RSA1) and T(RSA2) were not significantly different from and closely linked to T(V1) (r = 0.99, p<0.001) and T(V2) (r = 0.99, p<0.001), respectively. In the five remaining subjects, only one non-linear increase was observed close to T(V2). Significant differences (p<0.04) were found between athlete and sedentary groups when T(RSA1) and T(RSA2) were expressed in terms of absolute and relative power and percentage of maximal aerobic power. In the sedentary group, T(RSA1) and T(RSA2) were 150.3 (18.7) W and 198.3 (28.8) W, respectively, whereas in the athlete group T(RSA1) and T(RSA2) were 247.3 (32.8) W and 316.0 (28.8) W, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic analysis of f(RSA) provides a useful tool for identifying ventilatory thresholds during graded and maximal exercise test in sedentary subjects and athletes.

摘要

目的

测试在运动试验期间测量的通气阈值是否可以通过对呼吸性窦性心律不齐频率(f(RSA))进行时变分析来评估。

方法

14名久坐不动的受试者和12名耐力运动员在自行车测力计上进行了分级和最大运动试验:初始负荷为75瓦(久坐不动的受试者)和150瓦(运动员),每2分钟增加37.5瓦。使用进化模型从心动周期序列中提取f(RSA)。根据通气量以及氧气和二氧化碳的通气当量的时间进程曲线确定第一通气阈值(T(V1))和第二通气阈值(T(V2))。

结果

从所有记录中准确提取了f(RSA),并且f(RSA)与呼吸频率呈正相关(r = 0.96(0.03),p<0.01)。在26名受试者中的21名中,确定f(RSA)有两个连续的非线性增加,定义了第一f(RSA)阈值(T(RSA1))和第二f(RSA)阈值(T(RSA2))。当表示为功率的函数时,T(RSA1)和T(RSA2)与T(V1)(r = 0.99,p<0.001)和T(V2)(r = 0.99,p<0.001)没有显著差异且紧密相关。在其余5名受试者中,仅在接近T(V2)处观察到一个非线性增加。当以绝对功率、相对功率和最大有氧功率百分比表示T(RSA1)和T(RSA2)时,运动员组和久坐不动组之间存在显著差异(p<0.04)。在久坐不动组中,T(RSA1)和T(RSA2)分别为150.3(18.7)瓦和198.3(28.8)瓦,而在运动员组中,T(RSA1)和T(RSA2)分别为247.3(32.8)瓦和316.0(28.8)瓦。

结论

f(RSA)的动态分析为识别久坐不动的受试者和运动员在分级和最大运动试验期间的通气阈值提供了一种有用的工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Influences of breathing patterns on respiratory sinus arrhythmia in humans during exercise.运动期间呼吸模式对人体呼吸性窦性心律不齐的影响。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005 Feb;288(2):H887-95. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00767.2004. Epub 2004 Sep 23.
2
Anaerobic threshold: the concept and methods of measurement.无氧阈:概念与测量方法
Can J Appl Physiol. 2003 Apr;28(2):299-323. doi: 10.1139/h03-023.
3
Methods to determine aerobic endurance.测定有氧耐力的方法。
Sports Med. 2002;32(11):675-700. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232110-00002.
10
Roles of Cl- channels and Ca2+ mobilization in stretch-induced increase of SA node pacemaker activity.
Am J Physiol. 1996 May;270(5 Pt 2):H1726-35. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1996.270.5.H1726.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验