Suppr超能文献

创伤复苏过程中的沟通:我们知道正在发生什么吗?

Communication during trauma resuscitation: do we know what is happening?

作者信息

Bergs Engelbert A G, Rutten Frans L P A, Tadros Tamer, Krijnen Pieta, Schipper Inger B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Traumacenter of the South-West Netherlands, ErasmusMC, University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Injury. 2005 Aug;36(8):905-11. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.047.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Verbal communication is essential for teamwork and leadership in high-intensity performances like trauma resuscitation. We evaluated communication during multidisciplinary trauma resuscitation.

METHODS

The main trauma room of a level one trauma centre was equipped with a digital video recording system. Resuscitations were consecutively and prospectively enrolled. Patients with revised trauma score (RTS)=12 were resuscitated by a 'minor trauma team' and patients with RTS<12 by a 'major trauma team'. Information transferral from physicians to other team members was evaluated separately for all ABCDE's, according to initiation, audibility and response. The observer was trained and the first 30 video's were excluded.

RESULTS

From May 1st to September 1st 2003, 205 resuscitations were included, 12 were lost for evaluation. The 'major trauma team' resuscitated 74 patients (ISS:21.4). Communication was audible in 56% and understandable in 44% during the primary survey. The 'minor trauma team' assessed 119 patients (ISS:7.4). Communication was audible in 43% and understandable in 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

Communication during trauma resuscitation was found to be sub optimal. This is potentially harmful for trauma victims. Professionals and institutions should be aware that communication is not self-evident. Introduction of an aviation-like communication feedback system could help to optimise trauma care.

摘要

目的

在诸如创伤复苏等高强度工作中,言语沟通对于团队协作和领导能力至关重要。我们评估了多学科创伤复苏过程中的沟通情况。

方法

一家一级创伤中心的主创伤室配备了数字视频记录系统。复苏过程被连续且前瞻性地纳入研究。创伤修正评分(RTS)=12的患者由“轻度创伤团队”进行复苏,RTS<12的患者由“重度创伤团队”进行复苏。根据启动情况、可听性和反应,对所有ABCDE环节从医生向其他团队成员的信息传递分别进行评估。观察者经过培训,前30个视频被排除。

结果

2003年5月1日至9月1日,共纳入205例复苏病例,12例因评估缺失。“重度创伤团队”复苏了74例患者(损伤严重度评分:21.4)。在初次检查期间,56%的沟通可被听到,44%可被理解。“轻度创伤团队”评估了119例患者(损伤严重度评分:7.4)。43%的沟通可被听到,33%可被理解。

结论

发现创伤复苏过程中的沟通情况未达最佳。这可能对创伤受害者有害。专业人员和机构应意识到沟通并非自然而然就能做好。引入类似航空领域的沟通反馈系统可能有助于优化创伤护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验