Keulartz Jozef, Schermer Maartje, Korthals Michiel, Swierstra Tsjalling
Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Sci Technol Human Values. 2004 Winter;29(1):3-29. doi: 10.1177/0162243903259188.
Neither traditional philosophy nor current applied ethics seem able to cope adequately with the highly dynamic character of our modern technological culture. This is because they have insufficient insight into the moral significance of technological artifacts and systems. Here, much can be learned from recent science and technology studies (STS). They have opened up the black box of technological developments and have revealed the intimate intertwinement of technology and society in minute detail. However, while applied ethics is characterized by a certain "technology blindness," the most influential approaches within STS show a "normative deficit" and display on agnostic or even antagonistic attitude toward ethics. To repair the blind spots of both applied ethics and STS, the authors sketch the contours of a pragmatist approach. They will explore the tasks and tools of a pragmatist ethics and pay special attention to the exploration of future worlds disclosed and shaped by technology and the management of deep value conflicts inherent in a pluralistic society.
传统哲学和当前的应用伦理学似乎都无法充分应对我们现代技术文化的高度动态性。这是因为它们对技术制品和系统的道德意义缺乏足够的洞察力。在此,我们可以从近期的科学技术研究(STS)中学到很多。它们打开了技术发展的黑匣子,并详细揭示了技术与社会的紧密交织。然而,应用伦理学具有某种“技术盲视”的特征,而STS中最具影响力的方法则表现出“规范缺失”,并对伦理学持不可知甚至敌对的态度。为了弥补应用伦理学和STS的盲点,作者勾勒出一种实用主义方法的轮廓。他们将探索实用主义伦理学的任务和工具,并特别关注对由技术揭示和塑造的未来世界的探索,以及对多元社会中固有深层价值冲突的管理。