Sims-Williams H, Jayson M I, Young S M, Baddeley H, Collins E
Br Med J. 1979 Nov 24;2(6201):1318-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6201.1318.
Ninety-four patients with non-specific lumbar pain referred to hospital rheumatology and orthopaedic clinics participated in a double-blind controlled trial comparing mobilisation and manipulation with placebo physiotherapy. Results were assessed immediately after the tratment course, two months later, and at one year. Many patients showed improvement, but in contrast to a study on general-practitioner patients with nonspecific back pain no definite advantage could be associated with mobilisation and manipulation. The benefits of mobilisation and manipulation for low back pain are probably restricted to hastening recovery in patients likely rapidly to improve spontaneously. Hence patients whose severity and duration of symptoms warrant specialist referral are less likely to benefit from the technique.
94名因非特异性腰痛到医院风湿科和骨科门诊就诊的患者参与了一项双盲对照试验,该试验比较了活动疗法和手法治疗与安慰剂理疗的效果。在治疗疗程结束后、两个月后以及一年时对结果进行了评估。许多患者有改善,但与一项针对全科医生诊治的非特异性背痛患者的研究不同,活动疗法和手法治疗并没有明确的优势。活动疗法和手法治疗对腰痛的益处可能仅限于加速那些可能会自发快速改善的患者的康复。因此,症状的严重程度和持续时间需要专科转诊的患者不太可能从该技术中获益。