Koes B W, Bouter L M, van Mameren H, Essers A H, Verstegen G M, Hofhuizen D M, Houben J P, Knipschild P G
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Limburg, Maastricht, Netherlands.
BMJ. 1992 Mar 7;304(6827):601-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6827.601.
To compare the effectiveness of manipulative therapy, physiotherapy, treatment by the general practitioner, and placebo therapy in patients with persistent non-specific back and neck complaints.
Randomised clinical trial.
Primary health care in the Netherlands.
256 patients with non-specific back and neck complaints of at least six weeks' duration who had not received physiotherapy or manipulative therapy in the past two years.
At the discretion of the manipulative therapists, physiotherapists, and general practitioners. Physiotherapy consisted of exercises, massage, and physical therapy (heat, electrotherapy, ultrasound, shortwave diathermy). Manipulative therapy consisted of manipulation and mobilisation of the spine. Treatment by general practitioners consisted of drugs (for example, analgesics), advice about posture, home exercises, and (bed)rest. Placebo treatment consisted of detuned shortwave diathermy (10 minutes) and detuned ultrasound (10 minutes).
Changes in severity of the main complaint and limitation of physical functioning measured on 10 point scales by a blinded research assistant and global perceived effect measured on a 6 point scale by the patients.
Many patients in the general practitioner and placebo groups received other treatment during follow up. Improvement in the main complaint was larger with manipulative therapy (4.5) than with physiotherapy (3.8) after 12 months' follow up (difference 0.9; 95% confidence interval 0.1 to 1.7). Manipulative therapy also gave larger improvements in physical functioning (difference 0.6; -0.1 to 1.3). The global perceived effect after six and 12 months' follow up was similar for both treatments.
Manipulative therapy and physiotherapy are better than general practitioner and placebo treatment. Furthermore, manipulative therapy is slightly better than physiotherapy after 12 months.
比较手法治疗、物理治疗、全科医生治疗和安慰剂治疗对持续性非特异性颈背痛患者的疗效。
随机临床试验。
荷兰的初级卫生保健机构。
256例有至少六周非特异性颈背痛且在过去两年内未接受过物理治疗或手法治疗的患者。
由手法治疗师、物理治疗师和全科医生自行决定。物理治疗包括运动、按摩和物理疗法(热敷、电疗、超声、短波透热疗法)。手法治疗包括脊柱的整复和松动。全科医生治疗包括药物(如镇痛药)、姿势建议、家庭锻炼和(卧床)休息。安慰剂治疗包括失谐短波透热疗法(10分钟)和失谐超声(10分钟)。
由一名盲法研究助理用10分制量表测量主要症状严重程度和身体功能受限情况的变化,以及由患者用6分制量表测量整体感知效果。
全科医生组和安慰剂组的许多患者在随访期间接受了其他治疗。随访12个月后,手法治疗组主要症状的改善程度(4.5)大于物理治疗组(3.8)(差异为0.9;95%置信区间为0.1至1.7)。手法治疗在身体功能方面的改善也更大(差异为0.6;-0.1至1.3)。两种治疗在随访6个月和12个月后的整体感知效果相似。
手法治疗和物理治疗优于全科医生治疗和安慰剂治疗。此外,随访12个月后,手法治疗略优于物理治疗。