Suppr超能文献

脊椎按摩疗法与医院门诊对下背痛的管理比较:一项可行性研究。工作组报告。

Comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient management of low back pain: a feasibility study. Report of a working group.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986 Mar;40(1):12-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.40.1.12.

Abstract

This is the report of a feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of chiropractic and hospital outpatient management for low back pain of mechanical origin. Preparations for the study included an approach to the General Medical Council for guidance about the intended collaboration between medically qualified and heterodox practitioners, detailed communication with local general practitioners, and the provision of a Medical Research Council (MRC) grant to cover payments to the chiropractors for work carried out in the course of the study. A total of 238 patients were considered, 197 of whom had initially presented to Northwick Park Hospital and the remaining 41 to the chiropractic clinic in Harrow. Only 6% of the patients presenting to the hospital refused to enter. The single most frequent reason for ineligibility in the hospital patients was freedom from pain at the time of the first hospital visit (23%). A variety of medical contraindications accounted for the exclusion of a further 24% of hospital patients. Patients presenting to the chiropractic group tended to have had shorter current episodes of back pain but to have had more NHS treatment in the past than those presenting to hospital. The commonest reason for exclusion among those presenting to the chiropractic clinic was refusal to enter (34%). Only 5% of the chiropractic patients were ineligible for medical reasons. Overall, 16% of those presenting to hospital and 44% of those presenting to the chiropractors were eligible and willing to enter the randomised treatment phase of the study. Of the 50 patients who entered the treatment phase, all but seven completed treatment and the six weekly self-completed assessments of progress. Patients whose current episodes had lasted less than a month progressed significantly more rapidly than those with longer current episodes. It is likely that sufficient numbers of patients with low back pain are prepared to take part in a formal randomized controlled trial. The organization and working methods for such a trial appear to be feasible. A full scale multicentre trial should aim to include about 2000 patients.

摘要

这是一项关于整脊疗法与医院门诊治疗机械性起源下背痛的随机对照试验的可行性研究报告。该研究的准备工作包括向英国医学总会咨询医学资质从业者与非传统从业者之间预期合作的指导意见、与当地全科医生进行详细沟通,以及提供医学研究理事会(MRC)拨款,以支付整脊师在研究过程中所做工作的报酬。总共考虑了238名患者,其中197名最初就诊于诺斯威克公园医院,其余41名就诊于哈罗的整脊诊所。到医院就诊的患者中只有6%拒绝参与。医院患者不符合资格的最常见单一原因是首次医院就诊时无痛(23%)。各种医学禁忌又导致另外24%的医院患者被排除。就诊于整脊治疗组的患者当前背痛发作时间往往较短,但过去接受国民医疗服务(NHS)治疗的次数比就诊于医院的患者更多。整脊诊所就诊者中被排除的最常见原因是拒绝参与(34%)。只有5%的整脊治疗患者因医学原因不符合资格。总体而言,到医院就诊者中有16%、到整脊师处就诊者中有44%符合资格并愿意进入研究的随机治疗阶段。在进入治疗阶段的50名患者中,除7名外均完成了治疗以及每周一次的自我进展评估。当前发作持续时间少于一个月的患者比发作时间较长的患者进展明显更快。很可能有足够数量的下背痛患者愿意参加正式的随机对照试验。此类试验的组织和工作方法似乎是可行的。一项全面的多中心试验应旨在纳入约2000名患者。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Objective Measurement Scales and Ambulatory Status.腰椎管狭窄症:客观测量量表与步行状态
Asian Spine J. 2018 Aug;12(4):765-774. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.765. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Remedial therapy after stroke: a randomised controlled trial.中风后的康复治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Feb 14;282(6263):517-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6263.517.
8
Chiropractors and the treatment of back pain.脊椎按摩师与背痛治疗
Rheumatol Rehabil. 1977 Feb;16(1):46-53. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/16.1.46.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验