Suppr超能文献

短波透热疗法与整骨疗法治疗非特异性下腰痛的对照比较。

Controlled comparison of short-wave diathermy treatment with osteopathic treatment in non-specific low back pain.

作者信息

Gibson T, Grahame R, Harkness J, Woo P, Blagrave P, Hills R

出版信息

Lancet. 1985 Jun 1;1(8440):1258-61. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92323-2.

Abstract

The effectiveness of spinal manipulation carried out by a non-medical qualified osteopath was compared with that of short-wave diathermy (SWD) and a placebo (detuned SWD) in 109 patients with low back pain. More than half the subjects in each of the 3 treatment groups benefited immediately from therapy. Significant improvements were observed in the 3 groups at the end of 2 weeks' treatment, and these were still apparent at 12 weeks. The outcome of treatment was unrelated to the initial severity or duration of pain or to the trend of pain towards deterioration or improvement. It is, therefore, unlikely that the results simply reflect the natural history of low back pain. Benefits obtained with osteopathy and SWD in this study may have been achieved through a placebo effect.

摘要

在109例腰痛患者中,对由非医学资质整骨疗法师实施的脊柱推拿、短波透热疗法(SWD)及安慰剂(失谐SWD)的疗效进行了比较。3个治疗组中每组均有超过半数的受试者立即从治疗中获益。在治疗2周结束时,3组均观察到显著改善,且在12周时这些改善依然明显。治疗结果与疼痛的初始严重程度或持续时间、或疼痛恶化或改善的趋势无关。因此,结果不太可能仅仅反映腰痛的自然病程。本研究中整骨疗法和短波透热疗法所获得的益处可能是通过安慰剂效应实现的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验