Yeka Adoke, Banek Kristin, Bakyaita Nathan, Staedke Sarah G, Kamya Moses R, Talisuna Ambrose, Kironde Fred, Nsobya Samuel L, Kilian Albert, Slater Madeline, Reingold Arthur, Rosenthal Philip J, Wabwire-Mangen Fred, Dorsey Grant
Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
PLoS Med. 2005 Jul;2(7):e190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020190. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
Drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum poses a major threat to malaria control. Combination antimalarial therapy including artemisinins has been advocated recently to improve efficacy and limit the spread of resistance, but artemisinins are expensive and relatively untested in highly endemic areas. We compared artemisinin-based and other combination therapies in four districts in Uganda with varying transmission intensity.
We enrolled 2,160 patients aged 6 mo or greater with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Patients were randomized to receive chloroquine (CQ) + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP); amodiaquine (AQ) + SP; or AQ + artesunate (AS). Primary endpoints were the 28-d risks of parasitological failure either unadjusted or adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescence from new infections. A total of 2,081 patients completed follow-up, of which 1,749 (84%) were under the age of 5 y. The risk of recrudescence after treatment with CQ + SP was high, ranging from 22% to 46% at the four sites. This risk was significantly lower (p < 0.01) after AQ + SP or AQ + AS (7%-18% and 4%-12%, respectively). Compared to AQ + SP, AQ + AS was associated with a lower risk of recrudescence but a higher risk of new infection. The overall risk of repeat therapy due to any recurrent infection (recrudescence or new infection) was similar at two sites and significantly higher for AQ + AS at the two highest transmission sites (risk differences = 15% and 16%, p < 0.003).
AQ + AS was the most efficacious regimen for preventing recrudescence, but this benefit was outweighed by an increased risk of new infection. Considering all recurrent infections, the efficacy of AQ + SP was at least as efficacious at all sites and superior to AQ + AS at the highest transmission sites. The high endemicity of malaria in Africa may impact on the efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy. The registration number for this trial is ISRCTN67520427 (http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/trial/|/0/67520427.html).
恶性疟原虫的耐药性对疟疾控制构成重大威胁。最近提倡使用包括青蒿素在内的联合抗疟疗法,以提高疗效并限制耐药性的传播,但青蒿素价格昂贵,且在高流行地区相对缺乏试验。我们在乌干达四个传播强度不同的地区比较了以青蒿素为基础的联合疗法和其他联合疗法。
我们纳入了2160名年龄在6个月及以上的非复杂性恶性疟患者。患者被随机分配接受氯喹(CQ)+磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(SP);阿莫地喹(AQ)+SP;或AQ+青蒿琥酯(AS)。主要终点是28天寄生虫学失败风险,该风险未调整或通过基因分型进行调整以区分复发与新感染。共有2081名患者完成随访,其中1749名(84%)年龄在5岁以下。CQ+SP治疗后的复发风险很高,在四个地点为22%至46%。AQ+SP或AQ+AS治疗后的该风险显著较低(p<0.01)(分别为7%-18%和4%-12%)。与AQ+SP相比,AQ+AS复发风险较低,但新感染风险较高。因任何复发性感染(复发或新感染)导致重复治疗的总体风险在两个地点相似,在两个传播率最高的地点,AQ+AS的该风险显著更高(风险差异=15%和16%,p<0.003)。
AQ+AS是预防复发最有效的方案,但新感染风险增加抵消了这一益处。考虑到所有复发性感染,AQ+SP在所有地点的疗效至少相同,在传播率最高的地点优于AQ+AS。非洲疟疾的高流行率可能会影响以青蒿素为基础的联合疗法的疗效。该试验的注册号为ISRCTN67520427(http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/trial/|/0/67520427.html)。