• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与患者讨论医疗费用:共情沟通的契机。

Discussing health care costs with patients: an opportunity for empathic communication.

作者信息

Hardee James T, Platt Frederic W, Kasper Ilene K

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jul;20(7):666-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0125.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0125.x
PMID:16050867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1490152/
Abstract

Escalating health care costs are affecting patients across the country. As employers and insurance companies face higher expenses, they may move to a cost-sharing strategy, which potentially increases financial burdens on patients. In this situation, physicians may find themselves serving as both medical and financial advisors for their patients. Clinical encounters in which patients experience financial hardship can be awkward and frustrating for both parties. Physicians must learn to discuss issues of affordability in a manner that builds, rather than detracts, from a therapeutic alliance. This article describes our experiences using several communication skills that can help in the discussion of health care costs with patients. The primary skill, empathic communication, which includes "we" statements and "I wish ..." statements, serves to create a platform for shared decision-making, negotiation, and a search for alternatives. In addition, it is helpful if physician offices have resource materials available and strategies identified to assist patients facing financial hardship.

摘要

不断攀升的医疗保健成本正在影响全国各地的患者。随着雇主和保险公司面临更高的费用,他们可能会转向成本分摊策略,这可能会增加患者的经济负担。在这种情况下,医生可能会发现自己既要为患者提供医疗建议,也要提供财务建议。患者经历经济困难的临床会诊对医患双方来说都可能尴尬且令人沮丧。医生必须学会以一种有助于建立而非破坏治疗联盟的方式来讨论可承受性问题。本文介绍了我们运用多种沟通技巧与患者讨论医疗保健成本的经验。主要技巧是共情沟通,包括使用“我们”表述和“我希望……”表述,有助于创建一个共同决策、协商及寻找替代方案的平台。此外,如果医生办公室备有资源材料并确定了帮助面临经济困难患者的策略,那将很有帮助。

相似文献

1
Discussing health care costs with patients: an opportunity for empathic communication.与患者讨论医疗费用:共情沟通的契机。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jul;20(7):666-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0125.x.
2
Empathic Validation in Physician-Patient Communication: An Approach to Conveying Empathy for Problems With Uncertain Solutions.医患沟通中的共情验证:一种针对解决方案不确定问题表达共情的方法。
Qual Health Res. 2022 Feb;32(3):413-425. doi: 10.1177/10497323211056312. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
3
Examining empathy in medical encounters: an observational study using the empathic communication coding system.审视医疗互动中的同理心:一项使用同理心沟通编码系统的观察性研究。
Health Commun. 2005;18(2):123-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1802_2.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
Empathic communication and gender in the physician-patient encounter.医患互动中的共情沟通与性别
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Dec;48(3):207-16. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00173-8.
7
Missed opportunities for interval empathy in lung cancer communication.肺癌沟通中错失的共情时机。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 22;168(17):1853-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.17.1853.
8
Examining the relationship between clinician communication and patient participatory behaviors in cardiology encounters.考察心脏病学诊疗中临床医生沟通与患者参与行为之间的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Dec;105(12):3473-3478. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
9
'Thinking on my feet': an improvisation course to enhance students' confidence and responsiveness in the medical interview.“随机应变”:一门提升学生在医学面试中自信心与反应能力的即兴课程。
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Feb;24(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493466.
10
Structured Analysis of Empathic Opportunities and Physician Responses during Lung Cancer Patient-Physician Consultations.在肺癌医患沟通中分析共情机会和医生反应的结构。
J Health Commun. 2019;24(9):711-718. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1665757. Epub 2019 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients With Skin Cancer Prefer to Participate in Procedure Cost Discussions: A Cross-Sectional Survey.皮肤癌患者更倾向于参与手术费用讨论:一项横断面调查。
Dermatol Res Pract. 2025 Sep 25;2025:1660527. doi: 10.1155/drp/1660527. eCollection 2025.
2
Understanding Financial Toxicity in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.了解头颈癌患者的经济毒性:一项系统综述。
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2023 Jan 23;17:11795549221147730. doi: 10.1177/11795549221147730. eCollection 2023.
3
Discussing Cost and Value in Patient Decision Aids and Shared Decision Making: A Call to Action.探讨患者决策辅助工具和共同决策中的成本与价值:行动呼吁。
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Jan 10;8(1):23814683221148651. doi: 10.1177/23814683221148651. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun.
4
Medical-Legal Partnerships Facilitate Patient-Provider Cost of Care Conversations: A Multisite Qualitative Study in the U.S.医疗法律伙伴关系促进医患成本的护理交流:美国的多地点定性研究
Clin Nurs Res. 2022 Nov;31(8):1500-1509. doi: 10.1177/10547738221120339. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
5
Evaluation of the integration of social accountability values into medical education using a problem-based learning curriculum.运用基于问题的学习课程评价医学教育中社会责任感的整合。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03245-6.
6
"It's a mess sometimes": patient perspectives on provider responses to healthcare costs, and how informatics interventions can help support cost-sensitive care decisions.“有时一团糟”:患者对医疗服务提供者应对医疗费用的看法,以及信息学干预如何有助于支持对成本敏感的护理决策。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 May 11;29(6):1029-1039. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac010.
7
Impact of Cost Conversation on Decision-Making Outcomes.成本沟通对决策结果的影响。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jun 12;5(4):802-810. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.05.006. eCollection 2021 Aug.
8
Assessment of Financial Toxicity Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer.评估晚期癌症老年患者的财务毒性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2025810. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25810.
9
The "Preparation for Shared Decision-Making" Tool for Women With Advanced Breast Cancer: Qualitative Validation Study.晚期乳腺癌女性的“共同决策准备”工具:定性验证研究
J Particip Med. 2019 Dec 20;11(4):e16511. doi: 10.2196/16511.
10
Financial Toxicity in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the United States: Current State and Future Directions.美国动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病中的经济毒性:现状与未来方向。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(19):e017793. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017793. Epub 2020 Sep 13.

本文引用的文献

1
A new model for physician-patient communication.一种新的医患沟通模式。
Patient Educ Couns. 1994 Jun;23(2):131-40. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(94)90051-5.
2
Barriers to patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs.患者与医生就自付费用进行沟通的障碍。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Aug;19(8):856-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30249.x.
3
Six strategies to identify and assist patients burdened by out-of-pocket prescription costs.识别和帮助因自付处方药费用而负担过重的患者的六种策略。
Cleve Clin J Med. 2004 May;71(5):433-7. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.71.5.433.
4
Communicating evidence for participatory decision making.为参与式决策提供证据
JAMA. 2004 May 19;291(19):2359-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.19.2359.
5
A prescription for protecting the doctor-patient relationship.维护医患关系的良方。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Feb;10(2 Pt 1):61-8.
6
Health benefits in 2003: premiums reach thirteen-year high as employers adopt new forms of cost sharing.2003年的健康福利:随着雇主采用新的成本分摊形式,保费达到了13年来的最高水平。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Sep-Oct;22(5):117-26. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.5.117.
7
Patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs.医患之间关于自付费用的沟通。
JAMA. 2003 Aug 20;290(7):953-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.7.953.
8
What is clinical empathy?什么是临床同理心?
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):670-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21017.x.
9
How to help your low-income patients get prescription drugs.
Fam Pract Manag. 2002 Nov-Dec;9(10):51-6.
10
"I" and "we": a concordancing analysis of how doctors and patients use first person pronouns in primary care consultations.“我”与“我们”:关于医生和患者在初级保健会诊中如何使用第一人称代词的语料库分析
Fam Pract. 2002 Oct;19(5):484-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.5.484.