Smith J R, Mildenhall S, Noble M J, Shepstone L, Koutantji M, Mugford M, Harrison B D W
School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Thorax. 2005 Dec;60(12):1003-11. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.043877. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
Morbidity and mortality associated with severe asthma might be reduced by interventions that address psychosocial factors contributing to adverse outcomes. A study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of a 6 month home based psychoeducational intervention delivered by a respiratory nurse specialist for adults at risk of adverse asthma outcomes.
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial was performed in 92 adults registered with hospital or primary care asthma clinics. All had previous hospital admissions and/or were on British Thoracic Society step 4-5 treatment and had failed to attend clinic appointments or were considered to have poor adherence to other aspects of their agreed management. Patients were visited in their homes for assessment and, where appropriate, intervention. The main outcomes measured were symptom control, asthma specific quality of life, and generic health status.
At the 6 month primary time point there were no significant differences between usual care and intervention groups in mean symptom control, physical functioning, or mental health scores (differences (with 95% CI) -0.35 (-1.83 to 1.13), 3.10 (-11.42 to 17.63), 0.42 (-10.22 to 11.07), respectively). Small effects on asthma specific quality of life up to 12 months (e.g. adjusted difference at 12 months 0.13 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.25)) and short term effects on generic health status, which mirrored improvements in aspects of self-care observed at the end of the intensive phase of the intervention, were apparent only from fully adjusted analyses.
A home based intervention provided by a nurse receiving psychological supervision may have effects on quality of life but is overall of limited long term benefit to adults at risk of adverse asthma outcomes.
通过针对导致不良后果的社会心理因素进行干预,可能会降低与重度哮喘相关的发病率和死亡率。开展了一项研究,以评估呼吸科专科护士对有不良哮喘结局风险的成年人进行为期6个月的居家心理教育干预的效果。
对92名在医院或初级保健哮喘诊所登记的成年人进行了一项实用的随机对照试验。所有人都曾住院治疗和/或正在接受英国胸科学会4 - 5级治疗,且未能按时就诊或被认为对商定治疗的其他方面依从性差。研究人员到患者家中进行评估,并在适当情况下进行干预。主要测量的结局指标为症状控制、哮喘特异性生活质量和一般健康状况。
在6个月的主要时间点,常规护理组和干预组在平均症状控制、身体功能或心理健康评分方面无显著差异(差异(95%置信区间)分别为-0.35(-1.83至1.13)、3.10(-11.42至17.63)、0.42(-10.22至11.07))。对哮喘特异性生活质量长达12个月有小的影响(例如,12个月时的调整差异为0.13(95%置信区间0.02至0.25)),对一般健康状况的短期影响反映了在干预强化阶段结束时观察到的自我护理方面的改善,这些仅在完全调整分析中才明显。
由接受心理监督的护士提供的居家干预可能对生活质量有影响,但总体而言,对有不良哮喘结局风险的成年人长期益处有限。