Brunekreef B, Forsberg B
Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80176, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur Respir J. 2005 Aug;26(2):309-18. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00001805.
Studies on health effects of airborne particulate matter (PM) have traditionally focused on particles <10 microm in diameter (PM10) or particles <2.5 microm in diameter (PM2.5). The coarse fraction of PM10, particles >2.5 microm, has only been studied recently. These particles have different sources and composition compared with PM2.5. This paper is based on a systematic review of studies that have analysed fine and coarse PM jointly and examines the epidemiological evidence for effects of coarse particles on health. Time series studies relating ambient PM to mortality have in some places provided evidence of an independent effect of coarse PM on daily mortality, but in most urban areas, the evidence is stronger for fine particles. The few long-term studies of effects of coarse PM on survival do not provide any evidence of association. In studies of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and respiratory admissions, coarse PM has a stronger or as strong short-term effect as fine PM, suggesting that coarse PM may lead to adverse responses in the lungs triggering processes leading to hospital admissions. There is also support for an association between coarse PM and cardiovascular admissions. It is concluded that special consideration should be given to studying and regulating coarse particles separately from fine particles.
关于空气中颗粒物(PM)对健康影响的研究传统上主要集中在直径小于10微米的颗粒物(PM10)或直径小于2.5微米的颗粒物(PM2.5)上。PM10的粗颗粒部分,即直径大于2.5微米的颗粒,直到最近才得到研究。与PM2.5相比,这些颗粒有不同的来源和组成。本文基于对联合分析细颗粒物和粗颗粒物的研究的系统综述,并审视了粗颗粒对健康影响的流行病学证据。在一些地方,将环境PM与死亡率相关联的时间序列研究提供了粗颗粒对每日死亡率有独立影响的证据,但在大多数城市地区,细颗粒的证据更强。关于粗颗粒对生存影响的少数长期研究没有提供任何关联证据。在慢性阻塞性肺疾病、哮喘和呼吸道入院的研究中,粗颗粒的短期影响与细颗粒一样强或更强,这表明粗颗粒可能导致肺部的不良反应,引发导致入院的过程。也有证据支持粗颗粒与心血管疾病入院之间存在关联。得出的结论是,应特别考虑将粗颗粒与细颗粒分开进行研究和监管。