Robertson A S, Rivara F P, Ebel B E, Lymp J F, Christakis D A
Child Health Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Inj Prev. 2005 Aug;11(4):209-12. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.009019.
To evaluate the validity of parents' self reported home safety practices concerning smoke detectors, bike helmets, car seats, and water heater temperature.
Parents of children 12 years old and under whose child had made at least one visit to a study clinic in the years 2000-2003.
As part of a randomized controlled trial to improve patient provider communication and preventive practices, parents' responses to telephone interview were compared with observations of safety practices during a home visit. Home visits were completed within nine weeks of the telephone interview. Parents were not told that the visit was part of a validation study and home visit observers were unaware of the interview responses. The authors calculated sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, and their corresponding confidence intervals.
Sensitivity (0.78 to 0.98) and positive predictive values (0.75 to 1.00) were high for all items. Specificities and negative predictive values were more variable and the highest estimates (specificity 0.95 to 1.00, negative predictive value 0.95 to 0.97) were for car seat types.
The results suggest that parent self report practice of certain injury prevention behaviors (owning a car seat, hot water temperatures) is reliable, whereas self reports on other practices (working smoke detectors, properly fitting bike helmets) may be overstated.
评估父母自我报告的关于烟雾探测器、自行车头盔、汽车座椅和热水器温度的家庭安全措施的有效性。
2000年至2003年间,其12岁及以下子女至少到研究诊所就诊过一次的儿童的父母。
作为一项旨在改善医患沟通和预防措施的随机对照试验的一部分,将父母对电话访谈的回答与家访期间对安全措施的观察结果进行比较。家访在电话访谈后的九周内完成。父母未被告知此次家访是验证研究的一部分,家访观察员也不知道访谈的回答。作者计算了敏感度、特异度、阳性和阴性预测值及其相应的置信区间。
所有项目的敏感度(0.78至0.98)和阳性预测值(0.75至1.00)都很高。特异度和阴性预测值的变化更大,汽车座椅类型的估计值最高(特异度0.95至1.00,阴性预测值0.95至0.97)。
结果表明,父母自我报告的某些预防伤害行为(拥有汽车座椅、热水温度)的做法是可靠的,而其他做法(正常工作的烟雾探测器、合适的自行车头盔)的自我报告可能被夸大了。