• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防与产品相关的伤害:海报警示的随机对照试验

Preventing product-related injuries: a randomized controlled trial of poster alerts.

作者信息

Pless I Barry, Hagel Brent, Patel Hema, Leduc Denis, Magdalinos Helen

机构信息

Dept. of Pediatrics and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2007 Jul-Aug;98(4):271-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03405401.

DOI:10.1007/BF03405401
PMID:17896734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6976268/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Product Safety Programme (PSP) of Health Canada is responsible for preventing product-related injuries. If PSP decides a product is dangerous, it can publicize its dangers, prohibit, or control its distribution; but for child products, the preferred option is to publicize its concerns. In the past, this included sending posters to paediatricians' offices and, more recently, placing alerts on the PSP website. This study examines the effectiveness of this process.

METHODS

15 Montreal paediatricians participated in a modified crossover randomized trial. During a randomly chosen intervention week, two product-related notices were posted in the paediatricians' waiting area. In the following or preceding week, these notices did not appear. Parents were interviewed by telephone to determine if they saw the posters and acted on the information received.

RESULTS

We interviewed 808 parents (86%) of the 940 who agreed to participate. Of these, only 16% of the intervention and less than 1% of the control group reported seeing the posters. There were no differences in reported changes in behaviours related to the notices. These findings are unchanged after taking account of socio-economic status. No parents cited the posters, websites, or paediatricians as their main source of information about dangerous products.

CONCLUSION

Product safety notices, whether sent to paediatricians' practices or posted on a website, cannot be relied upon to reach parents of preschool age children. Other approaches require consideration, such as increasing the power of PSP to regulate product safety.

摘要

背景

加拿大卫生部的产品安全计划(PSP)负责预防与产品相关的伤害。如果PSP认定某产品存在危险,它可以公布其危险信息、禁止或控制其分销;但对于儿童产品,首选方案是公布其相关问题。过去,这包括向儿科医生办公室发送海报,最近则是在PSP网站上发布警报。本研究考察了这一过程的有效性。

方法

15名蒙特利尔的儿科医生参与了一项改良的交叉随机试验。在随机选择的干预周内,在儿科医生的候诊区张贴两份与产品相关的通知。在接下来或之前的一周,这些通知不出现。通过电话采访家长,以确定他们是否看到了海报并根据收到的信息采取了行动。

结果

我们采访了940名同意参与的家长中的808名(86%)。其中,干预组中只有16%的家长以及对照组中不到1%的家长报告看到了海报。在报告的与通知相关的行为变化方面没有差异。在考虑社会经济地位后,这些结果没有变化。没有家长将海报、网站或儿科医生列为他们获取危险产品信息的主要来源。

结论

无论是发送到儿科医生诊所还是张贴在网站上的产品安全通知,都不能指望能传达给学龄前儿童的家长。需要考虑其他方法,比如增强PSP监管产品安全的权力。

相似文献

1
Preventing product-related injuries: a randomized controlled trial of poster alerts.预防与产品相关的伤害:海报警示的随机对照试验
Can J Public Health. 2007 Jul-Aug;98(4):271-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03405401.
2
Baby walkers: paediatricians' knowledge, attitudes, and health promotion.婴儿学步车:儿科医生的认知、态度及健康促进
Arch Dis Child. 2003 Dec;88(12):1084-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.12.1084.
3
Community paediatricians' counseling patterns and knowledge of recommendations relating to child restraint use in motor vehicles.社区儿科医生关于儿童在机动车中使用约束装置的咨询模式及对相关建议的了解情况。
Inj Prev. 2004 Apr;10(2):103-6. doi: 10.1136/ip.2003.004168.
4
Randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of an interactive multimedia food safety education program for clients of the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children.一项随机对照试验,以确定针对妇女、婴儿和儿童特殊补充营养计划的参与者的交互式多媒体食品安全教育计划的有效性。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2008 Jun;108(6):978-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.03.011.
5
Comparison of knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of health professionals and parents regarding child injuries.
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2014 Dec;22(4):245-50. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a4016.
6
Children in taxis: an opportunity for pediatricians and emergency physicians to save lives?出租车内的儿童:儿科医生和急诊医生拯救生命的契机?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Nov;22(11):704-9. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000238742.96606.20.
7
Information through television: does it promote child safety?通过电视传播的信息:它能促进儿童安全吗?
Inj Prev. 1996 Mar;2(1):36-40. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.1.36.
8
Use of traditional Chinese medicine in Singapore children: perceptions of parents and paediatricians.新加坡儿童中传统中医药的使用:家长和儿科医生的看法。
Singapore Med J. 2009 Dec;50(12):1162-8.
9
An analysis of the factors influencing the paediatrician-parents relationship: the importance of the socio-demographic characteristics of the mothers.影响儿科医生与家长关系的因素分析:母亲社会人口学特征的重要性
Child Care Health Dev. 2005 Sep;31(5):575-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00547.x.
10
Unintentional injury prevention: what can paediatricians do?意外伤害预防:儿科医生能做什么?
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2009 Aug;94(4):102-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.145649.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes after injury prevention counselling in a paediatric office setting: a 25-year review.儿科门诊环境中伤害预防咨询后的结果:25年回顾
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2018 Jun 18;2(1):e000300. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000300. eCollection 2018.
2
Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention.居家安全教育及提供预防伤害的安全设备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD005014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005014.pub3.
3
Protecting children from dangerous products: fundamental change needed.
Inj Prev. 2007 Oct;13(5):290. doi: 10.1136/ip.2007.017236.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of smoking cessation aids and mass media among recent quitters.戒烟辅助工具和大众媒体对近期戒烟者的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Mar;30(3):217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.026.
2
Validating self reported home safety practices in a culturally diverse non-inner city population.在文化多元的非市中心人群中验证自我报告的家庭安全措施。
Inj Prev. 2006 Feb;12(1):52-7. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.009399.
3
Validation of parent self reported home safety practices.家长自我报告的家庭安全措施的验证。
Inj Prev. 2005 Aug;11(4):209-12. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.009019.
4
Drug approval system questioned in US and Canada.美国和加拿大对药品审批系统提出质疑。
CMAJ. 2005 Feb 1;172(3):317-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.045312.
5
Child safety education and the world wide web: an evaluation of the content and quality of online resources.儿童安全教育与万维网:在线资源的内容与质量评估
Inj Prev. 2004 Feb;10(1):59-61. doi: 10.1136/ip.2003.003327.
6
Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a randomised controlled trial.一项随机对照试验中使用的家庭安全调查问卷的验证
Inj Prev. 2003 Jun;9(2):180-3. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.2.180.
7
Expanding the precautionary principle.扩展预防原则。
Inj Prev. 2003 Mar;9(1):1-2. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.1.1.
8
Characteristics and risk factors for accident injury in Canada from 1986 to 1996: an analysis of the Canadian Accident Injury Reporting and Evaluation (CAIRE) database.1986年至1996年加拿大意外伤害的特征及风险因素:对加拿大意外伤害报告与评估(CAIRE)数据库的分析
Inj Control Saf Promot. 2002 Jun;9(2):73-81. doi: 10.1076/icsp.9.2.73.8701.
9
Bunk versus conventional beds: a comparative assessment of fall injury risk.双层床与传统床:跌倒伤害风险的比较评估
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Jun;56(6):413-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.6.413.
10
Safety education of pedestrians for injury prevention: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.预防行人受伤的安全教育:随机对照试验的系统评价
BMJ. 2002 May 11;324(7346):1129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7346.1129.