Thomas K A, Hassanein R S, Christophersen E R
Pediatrics. 1984 Nov;74(5):879-82.
The inclusion of counseling on home safety procedures has been recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics as a routine part of well-child care. However, few, if any, data exist to give direction to the pediatrician interested in advising parents about home safety. In the present study, 58 couples were randomly assigned, prospectively, to an experimental group and a control group. Both were enrolled in a single group well-child care class that lasted 90 minutes. The control group was provided with information and discussion on nutrition, dental care, safety in the car and home, child development, child rearing, illness management, and immunizations. The experimental group received information and discussion on the same topics, and they also received specific information on burn prevention: hot water heater settings and smoke detectors. On a subsequent home visit, 65% of the couples in the experimental group had their hot water temperature measured at 54.4 degrees C (130 degrees F) or less, whereas all of the couples in the control group had hot water temperatures of more than 54.4 degrees C (130 degrees F) (a significant difference). Although only one couple in the experimental group did not have an operational smoke detector, enough of the couples in the control group had operational smoke detectors that results were not significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
美国儿科学会建议将关于家庭安全程序的咨询纳入儿童健康保健的常规内容。然而,几乎没有数据能为有意向家长提供家庭安全建议的儿科医生提供指导。在本研究中,58对夫妇被前瞻性地随机分为实验组和对照组。两组都参加了一个为期90分钟的单组儿童健康保健课程。对照组接受了关于营养、牙齿护理、乘车和居家安全、儿童发育、育儿、疾病管理及免疫接种的信息和讨论。实验组接受了相同主题的信息和讨论,并且还收到了关于预防烧伤的具体信息:热水器温度设置和烟雾探测器。在随后的家访中,实验组65%的夫妇家热水温度测量值为54.4摄氏度(130华氏度)或更低,而对照组所有夫妇家热水温度都超过54.4摄氏度(130华氏度)(差异显著)。尽管实验组只有一对夫妇没有可正常使用的烟雾探测器,但对照组有足够多夫妇有可正常使用的烟雾探测器,所以结果不显著。(摘要截选至250词)