• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物恐怖主义事件后国会山工作人员的担忧:关于当局应对措施的焦点小组讨论

Concerns of Capitol Hill staff workers after bioterrorism: focus group discussions of authorities' response.

作者信息

North Carol S, Pollio David E, Pfefferbaum Betty, Megivern Deborah, Vythilingam Meena, Westerhaus Elizabeth Terry, Martin Gregory J, Hong Barry A

机构信息

School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005 Aug;193(8):523-7. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000172598.82779.12.

DOI:10.1097/01.nmd.0000172598.82779.12
PMID:16082296
Abstract

Systematic studies of mental health effects of bioterrorism on exposed populations have not been carried out. Exploratory focus groups were conducted with an exposed population to provide qualitative data and inform empirical research. Five focus groups of 28 political worker volunteers were conducted 3 months after the October 15, 2001, anthrax attack on Capitol Hill. More than 2000 transcribed focus group passages were categorized using qualitative software. The category with the most items was authorities' response (23% passages), and much of this discussion pertained to communication by authorities. The category with the fewest items was symptoms (4%). Identified issues were less within individuals and more between them and authorities. Risk communication by authorities regarding safety and medical issues was a prominent concern among Capitol Hill office staff workers regarding the anthrax incident on Capitol Hill. This suggests focus on risk communication in developing interventions, but more systematic investigation is needed.

摘要

尚未对生物恐怖主义对受影响人群心理健康的影响进行系统研究。针对受影响人群开展了探索性焦点小组,以提供定性数据并为实证研究提供信息。2001年10月15日国会山发生炭疽袭击事件3个月后,对28名政治工作志愿者进行了5个焦点小组访谈。使用定性软件对2000多条焦点小组访谈记录进行了分类。项目最多的类别是当局的应对措施(占23%的记录),其中大部分讨论与当局的沟通有关。项目最少的类别是症状(占4%)。发现的问题较少涉及个人,更多涉及个人与当局之间的问题。当局就安全和医疗问题进行的风险沟通是国会山办公室工作人员对国会山炭疽事件的一个突出担忧。这表明在制定干预措施时应关注风险沟通,但还需要更系统的调查。

相似文献

1
Concerns of Capitol Hill staff workers after bioterrorism: focus group discussions of authorities' response.生物恐怖主义事件后国会山工作人员的担忧:关于当局应对措施的焦点小组讨论
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005 Aug;193(8):523-7. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000172598.82779.12.
2
Exposure to bioterrorism and mental health response among staff on Capitol Hill.国会山工作人员接触生物恐怖主义情况及心理健康应对措施
Biosecur Bioterror. 2009 Dec;7(4):379-88. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2009.0031.
3
Capitol hill staff workers' experiences of bioterrorism: qualitative findings from focus groups.国会山工作人员的生物恐怖主义经历:焦点小组的定性研究结果
J Trauma Stress. 2005 Feb;18(1):79-88. doi: 10.1002/jts.20006.
4
In their own words: lessons learned from those exposed to anthrax.用他们自己的话说:从接触炭疽的人身上吸取的教训。
Am J Public Health. 2005 Mar;95(3):489-95. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.038349.
5
Anthrax Exposure, Belief in Exposure, and Postanthrax Symptoms Among Survivors of a Bioterrorist Attack on Capitol Hill.炭疽暴露、对暴露的信念和生物恐怖袭击事件中 Capitol Hill 幸存者的炭疽后症状。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019 Jun;13(3):555-560. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2018.115. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
6
Anthrax attack at the United States Capitol. Front line thoughts.美国国会大厦发生炭疽袭击事件。前线思考。
AAOHN J. 2002 Apr;50(4):170-3.
7
Media exposure to bioterrorism: stress and the anthrax attacks.媒体对生物恐怖主义的报道:压力与炭疽袭击
Psychiatry. 2005 Spring;68(1):28-42. doi: 10.1521/psyc.68.1.28.64188.
8
Postal workers' perspectives on communication during the anthrax attack.邮政工作人员对炭疽袭击期间沟通情况的看法。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2005;3(3):207-15. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2005.3.207.
9
The US capitol bioterrorism anthrax exposures: clinical epidemiological and immunological characteristics.美国国会大厦生物恐怖主义炭疽暴露事件:临床、流行病学及免疫学特征
J Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 15;195(2):174-84. doi: 10.1086/510312. Epub 2006 Dec 6.
10
The anthrax attacks 10 years later.炭疽袭击 10 年后。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 3;156(1 Pt 1):41-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-12-201112200-00373. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A Qualitative Narrative Study of Rescue and Recovery Workers Responding to the Terrorist Bombing of Oklahoma City's Murrah Building.对俄克拉荷马城默拉大楼恐怖爆炸事件救援和恢复工作人员的定性叙事研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2024 Aug 1;66(8):682-688. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003140. Epub 2024 May 15.
2
Key Attributes of a Medical Learning Community Mentor at One Medical School.一所医学院校医学学习社区导师的关键特质
Med Sci Educ. 2019 May 15;29(3):721-730. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00746-w. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
A qualitative analysis of satisfaction with justice and desire for revenge in survivors of the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York City's World Trade Center.
对2001年9月11日纽约市世界贸易中心袭击事件幸存者对正义的满意度和复仇欲望的定性分析。
Peace Confl. 2019 Aug;25(3):246-254. doi: 10.1037/pac0000362. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
4
A focus group study of the impact of trauma exposure in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.一项关于9·11恐怖袭击中创伤暴露影响的焦点小组研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;50(4):569-78. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0970-5. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
5
Workplace response of companies exposed to the 9/11 World Trade Center attack: a focus-group study.暴露于 9·11 世界贸易中心袭击事件的公司的职场应对:一项焦点小组研究。
Disasters. 2013 Jan;37(1):101-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01295.x. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
6
Exposure to bioterrorism and mental health response among staff on Capitol Hill.国会山工作人员接触生物恐怖主义情况及心理健康应对措施
Biosecur Bioterror. 2009 Dec;7(4):379-88. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2009.0031.
7
Public willingness to take a vaccine or drug under Emergency Use Authorization during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行期间公众对在紧急使用授权下接种疫苗或使用药物的意愿。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2009 Sep;7(3):275-90. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2009.0041.
8
The anthrax vaccine and research: reactions from postal workers and public health professionals.炭疽疫苗与研究:邮政工作人员和公共卫生专业人员的反应
Biosecur Bioterror. 2008 Dec;6(4):321-33. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2007.0064.
9
The psychological aspects of terrorism: from denial to hyperbole.恐怖主义的心理层面:从否认到夸张。
J R Soc Med. 2005 Dec;98(12):557-62. doi: 10.1177/014107680509801222.