Taunton Roma Lee, Bott Marjorie J, Koehn Mary L, Miller Peggy, Rindner Ellen, Pace Karen, Elliott Carol, Bradley Katherine J, Boyle Diane, Dunton Nancy
University of Kansas Medical Center, School of Nursing, Kansas City, KS 66160-7502, USA.
J Nurs Meas. 2004 Fall;12(2):101-22. doi: 10.1891/jnum.2004.12.2.101.
The valid measurement of nurses' job satisfaction is critical because job satisfaction is important for the retention of qualified nurses to provide patient care in hospitals. Two studies were conducted to adapt the Stamps Index of Work Satisfaction (1997b) to measure work satisfaction at the patient care unit level for use by the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI). In Study 1 (n = 918 RNs) exploratory factor analysis of data obtained using the NDNQI-Adapted Index replicated the conceptual dimensions of the Stamps measure. Associations with scores on Job Enjoyment were evidence that the Index measured the intended construct. Using theta, the reliability of the composite subscales was .91. The adapted Work Satisfaction subscale scores explained 46% of the variance in Job Enjoyment, with each subscale contributing uniquely (p < .001). In Study 2 (n = 2277 RNs) confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling supported the 7-subscale structure for the Adapted Index (CFI [719] = .88; RMR = .05). Replication of associations between scores on the Index subscales and Job Enjoyment provided further evidence regarding validity of the data, since the Work Satisfaction subscales explained 56% of the variance in Job Enjoyment. The feasibility of using an on-line version of the Adapted-Index for data collection was demonstrated. The findings from the two studies indicate that the adapted Index of Work Satisfaction has a structure similar to the original instrument and is a reliable and valid measure of work satisfaction at the patient care unit level.
有效衡量护士的工作满意度至关重要,因为工作满意度对于留住合格护士以在医院提供患者护理服务而言非常重要。开展了两项研究,对《斯坦普斯工作满意度指数》(1997b)进行改编,以衡量患者护理单元层面的工作满意度,供国家护理质量指标数据库(NDNQI)使用。在研究1(n = 918名注册护士)中,对使用NDNQI改编指数获得的数据进行探索性因素分析,重现了斯坦普斯量表的概念维度。与工作乐趣得分的相关性证明该指数测量了预期的结构。使用θ系数,综合子量表的信度为0.91。改编后的工作满意度子量表得分解释了工作乐趣中46%的方差,每个子量表都有独特贡献(p < .001)。在研究2(n = 2277名注册护士)中,使用结构方程模型进行验证性因素分析,支持了改编指数的7个子量表结构(CFI [719] = .88;RMR = .05)。指数子量表得分与工作乐趣之间关联的重现为数据的有效性提供了进一步证据,因为工作满意度子量表解释了工作乐趣中56%的方差。证明了使用改编指数的在线版本进行数据收集的可行性。两项研究的结果表明,改编后的工作满意度指数具有与原始工具相似的结构,是患者护理单元层面工作满意度的可靠且有效的衡量指标。