PURPOSE

The nontraditional clinical research rotation at the University of Tennessee College of Medicine-Chattanooga Unit is described and its efficacy evaluated by the number of peer-reviewed publications produced.

METHODS

In 1988, a mandatory year of clinical research was added to the general surgery curriculum. The year is completed in 3 4-month rotations, 1 each during the PGY-2, PGY-3, and PGY-4 years. Curriculum vitae of 31 graduates of the traditional 5-year residency were evaluated for publications produced during residency and 1 year beyond training. Comparison was made to 15 subjects; 8 were 6-year graduates and 7 were PGY-4, PGY-5, or PGY-6 residents having completed the research year. Statistical analysis used the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data as well as an independent t test with significance set at 0.05. Publications were verified by a MEDLINE search. Six-year graduates also completed a questionnaire regarding their research experience.

RESULTS

Graduates of the 5-year program completed an average of 0.94 publications during residency, whereas 6-year graduates completed an average of 2.67 publications (p < 0.001). Opinions varied regarding desire to pursue research and the benefit of the research year.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that basic science research is not the only model; academic productivity can be improved with an additional year devoted to clinical research. Advantages to this nontraditional approach include decreased likelihood of decline of clinical skills and knowledge, ability to maintain long-term projects, and a physical and mental break from a demanding clinical residency.