Lever Marie, Moore John
Greenwood Institute, University of Leicester.
Community Pract. 2005 Jul;78(7):246-50.
This project tested the hypothesis that low attendance rates at a Sure Start child health surveillance session might increase if appointments were preceded by intervention home visits from research assistants drawn from the local community. The assistants would explain the purpose of surveillance and discuss problems preventing attendance. A randomised control trial showed no increase in surveillance attendance after two-thirds of the intervention group were successfully visited. This negative finding was despite the partnership with local people acting as research assistants working well. Other factors that might have influenced attendance were investigated at an evaluation interview undertaken by community members in homes after the surveillance date. Only 55 per cent of the families could be contacted for evaluation. Six out of 10 of those who had no evaluation were the same families who had not attended the surveillance session. The reasons why these families missed surveillance sessions is yet to be identified. Further research is needed that explores the reason why some families do come for surveillance, the nature of the barriers to attendance in those who do not attend and to look for opportunities for fresh interventions that might give more children access to pre-school facilities.
如果在预约儿童健康监测前,由当地社区的研究助理进行干预性家访,“确保开端”儿童健康监测的低出勤率可能会有所提高。这些助理会解释监测的目的,并讨论影响出勤率的问题。一项随机对照试验表明,在三分之二的干预组成功接受家访后,监测出勤率并未提高。尽管与作为研究助理的当地人合作顺利,但仍得出了这一负面结果。在监测日期过后,社区成员在家庭中进行的评估访谈中,对其他可能影响出勤率的因素进行了调查。只有55%的家庭能够被联系上进行评估。在未接受评估的家庭中,十分之六与未参加监测的家庭相同。这些家庭错过监测的原因尚待查明。需要进一步开展研究,探究一些家庭前来接受监测的原因、未参加监测家庭的出勤障碍的性质,并寻找新的干预机会,以便让更多儿童能够使用学前设施。