Livingstone M B, Prentice A M, Coward W A, Strain J J, Black A E, Davies P S, Stewart C M, McKenna P G, Whitehead R G
Human Nutrition Research Group, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Jul;56(1):29-35. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/56.1.29.
Energy intakes assessed by 7-d weighted dietary records (EI-WDRs) and diet histories (EI-DHs) were compared with concurrent estimates of total energy expenditure (TEE) by the doubly labeled water method in 78 subjects aged 3-18 y. EI-WDRs were not obtained from the 3- and 5-y-old subjects. EI-WDRs in the 7- and 9-y-old children were 108 +/- 25% (n = 12) and 97 +/- 15% (n = 12), respectively, of corresponding TEE values showing good agreement. However in the 12-, 15-, and 18-y-old subjects EI-WDR averaged 89 +/- 12% (n = 12), 78 +/- 18% (n = 12), and 73 +/- 25% (n = 10), respectively, of corresponding TEE values. The difference was greater than or equal to 20% in 13 adolescents. Mean EI-DHs were 114 +/- 19% (3 y), 111 +/- 19% (5 y), 111 +/- 23% (7 y), 106 +/- 9% (9 y), 114 +/- 17% (12 y), 101 +/- 21% (15 y), and 98 +/- 21% (18 y) of TEE estimates. Differences were significant in the 3-, 9-, and 12-y-old subjects. Results suggest that 7-d EI-WDRs tend to underestimate food intake of adolescents. Although EI-DHs were biased towards overestimation in most age groups and individual measurements lacked precision, EI-DHs were more representative of habitual intake than were EI-WDRs.
通过7天加权饮食记录(EI-WDR)和饮食史(EI-DH)评估的能量摄入量,与采用双标水法对78名3至18岁受试者同时进行的总能量消耗(TEE)估计值进行了比较。3岁和5岁的受试者未获取EI-WDR。7岁和9岁儿童的EI-WDR分别为相应TEE值的108±25%(n = 12)和97±15%(n = 12),显示出良好的一致性。然而,在12岁、15岁和18岁的受试者中,EI-WDR分别平均为相应TEE值的89±12%(n = 12)、78±18%(n = 12)和73±25%(n = 10)。13名青少年的差异大于或等于20%。EI-DH的平均值分别为TEE估计值的114±19%(3岁)、111±19%(5岁)、111±23%(7岁)、106±9%(9岁)、114±17%(12岁)、101±21%(15岁)和98±21%(18岁)。3岁、9岁和12岁的受试者差异显著。结果表明,7天的EI-WDR往往会低估青少年的食物摄入量。尽管EI-DH在大多数年龄组中倾向于高估,且个体测量缺乏精确性,但EI-DH比EI-WDR更能代表习惯性摄入量。