• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对缺血性晚期心力衰竭患者采用药物治疗、手术或心脏移植进行分配后的生存情况比较。

Comparison of survival by allocation to medical therapy, surgery, or heart transplantation for ischemic advanced heart failure.

作者信息

Lim Eric, Ali Ziad, Ali Ayyaz, Motalleb-Zadeh Reza, Jackson Christopher, Ong Seok Ling, Halstead James, Sharples Linda, Parameshwar Jayan, Wallwork John, Large Stephen R

机构信息

Transplant Unit, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Aug;24(8):983-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.05.027.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2004.05.027
PMID:16102430
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To ascertain survival of ischemic advanced heart failure patients by treatment allocation, we examined the outcome of transplant assessment patients allocated to medical therapy, high-risk conventional surgery, or transplantation.

METHODS

Patients were identified from the Papworth transplant database and excluded if primary etiology was not ischemic. Grouping was undertaken according to treatment allocation at initial assessment, and analysis was performed by intention to treat. Survival was computed from the time of assessment and Cox regression used to stratify patients according risk with the Heart Failure Survival Score.

RESULTS

From May 1993 to September 2001, a total of 755 patients were admitted for transplant assessment, with 348 (46.1%) identified as having heart failure of ischemic origin. Variables required for calculation of the Heart Failure Survival Score was available in 273 patients (78.4%), and 20 patients (7.3%) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 253 patients, 89 (35.2%) were allocated to medical therapy, 32 (12.6%) to surgery, and 132 (52.2%) to transplantation. The relative risk (95% confidence limit) of death compared with medical therapy was 0.62 (0.28, 1.40) for surgery and 0.38 (0.24, 0.61) for transplantation in medium- to high-risk patients. For low-risk patients, the relative risks for death compared with medical therapy were 1.87 (0.63, 5.60) for surgery and 1.97 (0.79, 4.96) for transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplantation improved survival of medium- and high-risk patients compared with medical therapy. In the low-risk group, this was not evident. However, repeated assessment of risk is required because the hazard for death rises steadily after the third year in these patients.

摘要

背景

为了通过治疗分配确定缺血性晚期心力衰竭患者的生存率,我们研究了被分配接受药物治疗、高风险传统手术或移植的移植评估患者的结局。

方法

从帕普沃思移植数据库中识别患者,若原发性病因不是缺血性的则排除。根据初次评估时的治疗分配进行分组,并采用意向性分析。从评估时间开始计算生存率,并使用心力衰竭生存评分通过Cox回归对患者进行风险分层。

结果

1993年5月至2001年9月,共有755例患者因移植评估入院,其中348例(46.1%)被确定为缺血性心力衰竭。273例患者(78.4%)可获得计算心力衰竭生存评分所需的变量,20例患者(7.3%)失访。在其余253例患者中,89例(35.2%)被分配接受药物治疗,32例(12.6%)接受手术治疗,132例(52.2%)接受移植治疗。中高危患者与药物治疗相比,手术治疗的死亡相对风险(95%置信区间)为0.62(0.28,1.40),移植治疗为0.38(0.24,0.61)。对于低风险患者,与药物治疗相比,手术治疗的死亡相对风险为1.87(0.63,5.60),移植治疗为1.97(0.79,4.96)。

结论

与药物治疗相比,移植治疗提高了中高危患者的生存率。在低风险组中,这并不明显。然而,由于这些患者在第三年后死亡风险稳步上升,因此需要反复评估风险。

相似文献

1
Comparison of survival by allocation to medical therapy, surgery, or heart transplantation for ischemic advanced heart failure.对缺血性晚期心力衰竭患者采用药物治疗、手术或心脏移植进行分配后的生存情况比较。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Aug;24(8):983-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.05.027.
2
Restrictive criteria for heart transplantation candidacy maximize survival of patients with advanced heart failure.心脏移植候选资格的限制性标准可使晚期心力衰竭患者的生存率最大化。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997 Feb;16(2):160-8.
3
The Munich score: a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure in the era of new medical therapies.慕尼黑评分:一种在新医学疗法时代预测门诊慢性心力衰竭患者生存率的临床指标。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Feb;27(2):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.10.016.
4
Survival and quality of life in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy for severe heart failure and in heart transplant recipients within a contemporary heart failure management program.在当代心力衰竭管理项目中,接受心脏再同步治疗的重度心力衰竭患者及心脏移植受者的生存情况和生活质量。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Jul;27(7):746-52. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.03.024. Epub 2008 May 19.
5
Validation of peak exercise oxygen consumption and the Heart Failure Survival Score for serial risk stratification in advanced heart failure.晚期心力衰竭连续风险分层中峰值运动耗氧量及心力衰竭生存评分的验证
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Mar 15;95(6):734-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.11.024.
6
Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: a new look at survival.作为终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置:对生存率的新审视。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jan;129(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.04.044.
7
Projected survival benefit as criterion for listing and organ allocation in heart transplantation.预期生存获益作为心脏移植列入名单及器官分配的标准
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Jun;24(6):680-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.04.015.
8
Should UNOS Status 2 patients undergo transplantation?
Heart Surg Forum. 2006;9(6):E823-7. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20061061.
9
Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection.左心室辅助装置植入作为终末期治疗在 REMATCH 时代后的结局:对患者选择的启示。
Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):497-505. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
10
Cardiac resynchronization therapy: long-term alternative to cardiac transplantation?心脏再同步治疗:心脏移植的长期替代方案?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Feb;87(2):432-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.09.071.

引用本文的文献

1
Heart Transplantation With Older Donors: Should There Be an Age Cutoff?心脏移植供体的年龄限制:是否应该设定年龄上限?
Transplant Proc. 2022 Oct;54(8):2088-2096. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
2
Predicting mortality in patients with acute heart failure: Role of risk scores.预测急性心力衰竭患者的死亡率:风险评分的作用。
World J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 26;7(12):902-11. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i12.902.
3
Who has advanced heart failure?: definition and epidemiology.谁患有晚期心力衰竭?:定义与流行病学
Congest Heart Fail. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):160-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00246.x. Epub 2011 Jul 21.