Saha Asim, Poddar Era, Mankad Minal
Occupational Medicine Division, National Institute of Occupational Health, Ahmedabad, India.
BMC Public Health. 2005 Aug 22;5:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-88.
Every individual mode of health education has its own merits, drawbacks as well as their own sphere of effectiveness. A specific mode of communication is more useful in a specific setting on a specific group than others. To search for optimum mode of communication for a specific audience is a major area of research in health education. The issue of imparting health education to a gathering of educated people, representing different fields of knowledge has remained a relatively less lighted aspect of health education research. In this backdrop this study was initiated for making a comparative assessment of different methods of dissemination of health education among educated people.
A cross-sectional interviewer administered questionnaire survey was conducted involving 142 randomly selected subjects during the last session of a five-day conference having health as main theme when the opinion of the delegates regarding different communication methods was asked for. Collected data was analyzed not only to find out the optimum mode of education dissemination in such a setting but also to find the contribution of different factors in the preferences of the study subjects.
The participants opted more (60%) for focused programs of smaller audience (sectional program). In both broad area (main program) and focused area programs (sectional), the participants preferred lectures (62% and 65.7% respectively). Specific topics were preferred both in lectures (67.6%) and symposia (57.7%). In the exhibition, exhibits seemed to be more attractive (62%) than the posters. Qualification has emerged to be a contributing factor in peoples' choice towards sectional programme and also in their affinity to symposia. Increased age was a significant contributor in participants' preference towards specific topics. Physical barriers of communication appeared to be a problem in the main program as well as in the exhibition. Lack of coherence among the speakers was reported (69%) to be a major reason for which symposia was not preferred.
This study concluded that while planning for health education dissemination in an educated group a focused programme should be formulated in small groups preferably in the form of lectures on specific topics, more so while dealing with participants of higher age group having higher educational qualification.
每种健康教育模式都有其优点、缺点以及各自的有效范围。一种特定的传播方式在特定环境中针对特定群体比其他方式更有用。寻找针对特定受众的最佳传播模式是健康教育研究的一个主要领域。向一群代表不同知识领域的受过教育的人传授健康教育这一问题,在健康教育研究中一直是一个相对较少受到关注的方面。在此背景下,启动了本研究,以对在受过教育的人群中传播健康教育的不同方法进行比较评估。
在一个以健康为主题的为期五天的会议的最后一场会议期间,对142名随机选择的受试者进行了一项由访谈员实施的横断面问卷调查,询问代表们对不同传播方法的看法。对收集到的数据进行分析,不仅是为了找出在这种环境下健康教育传播的最佳模式,也是为了找出不同因素在研究对象偏好中的作用。
参与者更多地(60%)选择面向较小受众的重点项目(分组项目)。在广泛领域(主要项目)和重点领域项目(分组项目)中,参与者都更喜欢讲座(分别为62%和65.7%)。在讲座(67.6%)和专题讨论会(57.7%)中都更倾向于特定主题。在展览中,展品似乎比海报更具吸引力(62%)。学历已成为人们选择分组项目以及对专题讨论会喜好的一个影响因素。年龄增长是参与者对特定主题偏好的一个重要因素。沟通的物理障碍在主要项目以及展览中似乎都是一个问题。据报告,演讲者之间缺乏连贯性(69%)是专题讨论会不受欢迎的主要原因。
本研究得出结论,在为受过教育的群体规划健康教育传播时,应制定面向小群体的重点项目,最好采用关于特定主题的讲座形式,在应对年龄较大、学历较高的参与者时更是如此。