• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两步法准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中皮瓣诱导和激光诱导的眼像差

Flap-induced and laser-induced ocular aberrations in a two-step LASIK procedure.

作者信息

Waheed Samra, Chalita Maria Regina, Xu Meng, Krueger Ronald R

机构信息

Department of Refractive Surgery, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland 44195, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2005 Jul-Aug;21(4):346-52. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20050701-08.

DOI:10.3928/1081-597X-20050701-08
PMID:16128331
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify aberrations created by making a laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap and treating the refractive error with laser ablation at a later date.

METHODS

Twenty-two eyes (11 patients) underwent a two-step LASIK procedure with the Alcon LADAR-Vision laser (Alcon Laboratories, Ft Worth, Tex). In the first step, a flap was created, and 1 month later the flap was lifted and laser ablation performed. Aberrations were measured with the LADARWave wavefront measurement device preoperatively, after making the flap (1 day, 1 week, 1 month) and after laser treatment (1 week and 3 months). Two different microkeratomes were used (Moria M2 [Moria; Antony, France] and SKBM [Alcon]). With the SKBM, all flap hinges were nasal; with the Moria M2, the flap hinge was randomly selected as superior in one eye and nasal in the other.

RESULTS

A slight hyperopic shift was seen in the manifest and wavefront refractions at 1 week and 1 month after flap creation for the Moria M2, but not for the SKBM. Statistically significant change in manifest sphere with the Moria M2 showed a mean shift at 1 month of +0.50 +/- 0.08 diopters (D) whereas the SKBM showed no mean shift, but less reproducibility, +0.06 +/- 0.17 D. Higher order aberrations after flap creation were statistically significantly higher for all except coma with both microkeratomes, but with no predictable trends observed. Although higher in magnitude, post flap aberrations were less than one quarter the increase noted in post laser aberrations, except for "other terms."

CONCLUSIONS

Creating a LASIK flap induces changes in lower and higher order ocular aberrations. The change in lower order terms is microkeratome dependent. Higher order aberrations increase to a much larger degree after laser than after flap, making a two-step procedure unnecessary in conventional LASIK.

摘要

目的

识别制作准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)瓣并在之后用激光消融治疗屈光不正所产生的像差。

方法

22只眼(11例患者)使用爱尔康LADAR-Vision激光(爱尔康实验室,沃思堡,得克萨斯州)接受了两步LASIK手术。第一步,制作瓣,1个月后掀起瓣并进行激光消融。术前、制作瓣后(1天、1周、1个月)以及激光治疗后(1周和3个月),使用LADARWave波前测量装置测量像差。使用了两种不同的微型角膜刀(Moria M2 [Moria;法国安东尼]和SKBM [爱尔康])。使用SKBM时,所有瓣蒂均位于鼻侧;使用Moria M2时,一只眼的瓣蒂随机选择为上方,另一只眼的瓣蒂为鼻侧。

结果

对于Moria M2,制作瓣后1周和1个月时,明显验光和波前验光出现轻微远视偏移,但对于SKBM则未出现。使用Moria M2时,明显球镜度的统计学显著变化显示1个月时平均偏移为+0.50±0.08屈光度(D),而SKBM未显示平均偏移,但可重复性较差,为+0.06±0.17 D。制作瓣后,除两种微型角膜刀的彗差外,所有高阶像差在统计学上均显著更高,但未观察到可预测的趋势。尽管幅度更高,但瓣后像差小于激光后像差增加量的四分之一,“其他项”除外。

结论

制作LASIK瓣会引起低阶和高阶眼像差的变化。低阶项的变化取决于微型角膜刀。高阶像差在激光后比瓣后增加的程度大得多,使得传统LASIK中无需两步手术。

相似文献

1
Flap-induced and laser-induced ocular aberrations in a two-step LASIK procedure.两步法准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中皮瓣诱导和激光诱导的眼像差
J Refract Surg. 2005 Jul-Aug;21(4):346-52. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20050701-08.
2
Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.比较飞秒激光制瓣和微型角膜刀制瓣在对侧眼诱导像差的随机前瞻性临床研究:对波前引导准分子原位角膜磨镶术的潜在影响
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jan;31(1):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.037.
3
Biomechanical effects of femtosecond and microkeratome-based flap creation: prospective contralateral examination of two patients.飞秒激光制瓣和微型角膜刀制瓣的生物力学效应:两名患者的前瞻性对侧眼检查
J Refract Surg. 2007 Oct;23(8):800-7. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20071001-10.
4
Induced optical aberrations following formation of a laser in situ keratomileusis flap.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Oct;28(10):1737-41. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01507-9.
5
Comparison of flap thickness reproducibility using microkeratomes with a second motor for advancement.
Ophthalmology. 2003 Oct;110(10):1931-4. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00786-3.
6
Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations.近视性准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术中波前优化消融与角膜地形图引导的个性化消融:高阶像差的比较研究
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011 Jul-Aug;42(4):314-20. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20110421-01. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
7
Corneal flap thickness and topography changes induced by flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis.准分子原位角膜磨镶术制作角膜瓣过程中引起的角膜瓣厚度及地形图变化。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jan;31(1):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.045.
8
Expanded range customcornea algorithms for myopia and astigmatism: one-month results.用于近视和散光的扩展范围定制角膜算法:一个月的结果。
J Refract Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):S619-23. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20040901-40.
9
Comparison of higher order aberrations after LASIK and LASEK for myopia.LASIK 和 LASEK 治疗近视术后高阶像差的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2010 Jan;26(1):45-51. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20101215-07.
10
[Safety of the automated microkeratome for Sub-Bowman's Keratomileusis on the flat cornea].[自动微型角膜刀在扁平角膜上进行角膜基质层下准分子原位角膜磨镶术的安全性]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016 Feb;39(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Higher-Order Aberrations After the Smooth Incision Lenticular Keratomileusis (SILK) Procedure Using the ELITA Femtosecond Platform for Correction of Myopic and Astigmatic Refractive Errors.使用ELITA飞秒平台进行平滑切口晶状体角膜磨镶术(SILK)矫正近视和散光屈光不正后高阶像差的评估。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 24;18:2155-2166. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S466932. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of age on visual and refractive results after LASIK: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser.年龄对LASIK术后视力和屈光结果的影响:机械微型角膜刀与飞秒激光的比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 18;12(3):488-495. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.03.21. eCollection 2019.
3
Comparison of Corneal Power and Astigmatism between Simulated Keratometry, True Net Power, and Total Corneal Refractive Power before and after SMILE Surgery.
全飞秒激光手术前后模拟角膜曲率计测量值、真实净屈光力和角膜总屈光力之间的角膜屈光力和散光比较。
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:9659481. doi: 10.1155/2017/9659481. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
4
Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations after Wavefront-guided LASIK and PRK: One Year Follow-Up Results.波前引导的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)后高阶像差的比较:一年随访结果
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016 Oct-Dec;11(4):350-357. doi: 10.4103/2008-322X.194069.
5
Effects of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) on corneal biomechanical measurements with the Corvis ST tonometer.准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)对Corvis ST眼压计测量角膜生物力学的影响。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb 12;9:305-11. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S76491. eCollection 2015.
6
[Corneal biomechanics: Corvis® ST parameters after LASIK].
Ophthalmologe. 2015 Sep;112(9):740-5. doi: 10.1007/s00347-015-3235-0.
7
Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia.比较经波前引导的激光原位角膜磨镶术与经波前引导的激光上皮下角膜磨镶术治疗近视的眼像差和光学质量参数。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;251(9):2163-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2356-x. Epub 2013 May 8.
8
The association between femtosecond laser flap parameters and ocular aberrations after uncomplicated custom myopic LASIK.常规 LASIK 术后女性眼激光参数与眼像差的相关性研究
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep;251(9):2155-62. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2328-1. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
9
Trends in refractive surgery at an academic center: 2007-2009.学术中心屈光手术趋势:2007-2009 年。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2011 May 14;11:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-11-11.
10
Ocular aberrations after wavefront optimized LASIK for myopia.波前像差引导的个体化切削治疗近视术后的像差变化。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jul-Aug;58(4):307-12. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.64139.