Williams Teresa A, Dobb Geoffrey J, Finn Judith C, Webb Steve A R
Royal Perth Hospital, 6000 Wellington, St. Perth, WA, Australia.
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1306-15. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2744-8. Epub 2005 Aug 24.
To determine whether the long-term benefit of an ICU requires prolonged patient follow-up we reviewed long-term survival of patients from general ICUs.
We carried out a computerised search of online databases Medline (1966-2004), Embase (1966-2004) and Cochrane Library (1966-2004) for studies reporting patients' long-term survival for greater than 12 months from general ICUs. SELECTED STUDIES: We identified 19 studies that met the selection criteria. The casemix and severity of illness varied. Differences included the services provided, investigator inclusion/exclusion criteria and proportion of medical patients (range 13-79%).
Mean reported ICU length of stay was 5.3 days. The study initiation time for follow-up varied (mostly from time of ICU admission), as did the duration of follow-up (16 months-13 years). ICU and hospital mortality rates ranged from 8% to 33% and 11% to 64%, respectively. The reported 5-year mortality ranged from 40% to 58%.
Well designed studies on long-term outcomes are needed to demonstrate the value of intensive care. Deficiencies in design, methodology, and reporting make interpretation and comparison difficult. Recommendations are made for the reporting of outcome from the ICU. Optimum duration of follow-up has not been determined.
为了确定重症监护病房(ICU)的长期效益是否需要对患者进行长期随访,我们回顾了综合ICU患者的长期生存率。
我们对在线数据库Medline(1966 - 2004年)、Embase(1966 - 2004年)和Cochrane图书馆(1966 - 2004年)进行了计算机检索,以查找报告综合ICU患者超过12个月长期生存率的研究。
我们确定了19项符合选择标准的研究。病例组合和疾病严重程度各不相同。差异包括提供的服务、研究者的纳入/排除标准以及内科患者的比例(范围为13% - 79%)。
报告的ICU平均住院时间为5.3天。随访的研究起始时间各不相同(大多从ICU入院时间开始),随访持续时间也不同(16个月至13年)。ICU和医院死亡率分别为8%至33%和11%至64%。报告的5年死亡率为40%至58%。
需要设计良好的关于长期结局的研究来证明重症监护的价值。设计、方法和报告方面的缺陷使得解释和比较变得困难。针对ICU结局报告提出了建议。最佳随访持续时间尚未确定。