Jedrychowski Wieslaw A, Perera Frederica P, Pac Agnieszka, Jacek Ryszard, Whyatt Robin M, Spengler John D, Dumyahn Thomas S, Sochacka-Tatara Elzbieta
Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, 7A, Kopernika St., 31-034 Krakow, Poland.
Sci Total Environ. 2006 Jul 31;366(1):47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
The study is a part of an ongoing prospective cohort study on the relationship between the exposure to environmental factors during pregnancy and birth outcomes and health of newborns. We have measured personal PM(2.5) level in the group of 407 non-smoking pregnant women during the 2nd trimester of pregnancy. On average, the participants from the city center were exposed to higher exposure than those from the outer city area (GM=42.0 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 36.8-48.0 vs. 35.8 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 33.5-38.2 microg/m(3)). More than 20% of study subjects were affected by high level of PM(2.5) pollution (above 65 microg/m(3)). PM(2.5) concentrations were higher during the heating season (GM=43.4 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 40.1-46.9 microg/m(3)) compared to non-heating season (GM=29.8 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 27.5-32.2 microg/m(3)). Out of all potential outdoor air pollution sources (high traffic density, bus depot, waste incinerator, industry etc.) considered in the bivariate analysis, only the proximity of industrial plant showed significant impact on the personal exposure (GM=54.3 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 39.4-74.8 microg/m(3)) compared with corresponding figure for those who did not declare living near the industrial premises (GM=36.2 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 34.1-38.4 microg/m(3)). The subjects declaring high exposure to ETS (>10 cigarettes daily) have shown very high level of personal exposure (GM=88.8 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 73.9-106.7 microg/m(3)) compared with lower ETS exposure (< or =10 cigarettes) (GM=46.3 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 40.0-53.5 microg/m(3)) and no-ETS exposure group (GM=33.9 microg/m(3), 95% CI: 31.8-36.1 microg/m(3)). The contribution of the background ambient PM(10) level was very strong determinant of the total personal exposure to PM(2.5) and it explained about 31% of variance between the subjects followed by environmental tobacco smoke (10%), home heating by coal/wood stoves (2%), other types of heating (2%) and the industrial plant localization in the proximity of household (1%).
该研究是一项正在进行的前瞻性队列研究的一部分,旨在探讨孕期环境因素暴露与出生结局及新生儿健康之间的关系。我们测量了407名非吸烟孕妇在孕期第二个月的个人PM2.5水平。平均而言,市中心的参与者比城市外围地区的参与者暴露水平更高(几何均值[GM]=42.0微克/立方米,95%置信区间[CI]:36.8 - 48.0,而城市外围地区为35.8微克/立方米,95%CI:33.5 - 38.2微克/立方米)。超过20%的研究对象受到高水平PM2.5污染影响(高于65微克/立方米)。与非供暖季相比,供暖季的PM2.5浓度更高(GM=43.4微克/立方米,95%CI:40.1 - 46.9微克/立方米,非供暖季GM=29.8微克/立方米,95%CI:27.5 - 32.2微克/立方米)。在双变量分析中考虑的所有潜在室外空气污染来源(高交通密度、公交 depot、垃圾焚烧炉、工业等)中,只有靠近工业厂房对个人暴露有显著影响(GM=54.3微克/立方米,95%CI:39.4 - 74.8微克/立方米),而未宣称居住在工业场所附近的人群相应数值为(GM=36.2微克/立方米,95%CI:34.1 - 38.4微克/立方米)。宣称高暴露于环境烟草烟雾(每天>10支香烟)的受试者个人暴露水平非常高(GM=88.8微克/立方米,95%CI:73.9 - 106.7微克/立方米),相比低环境烟草烟雾暴露(≤10支香烟)(GM=46.3微克/立方米,95%CI:40.0 - 53.5微克/立方米)和无环境烟草烟雾暴露组(GM=33.9微克/立方米,95%CI:31.8 - 36.1微克/立方米)。背景环境PM10水平的贡献是个人PM2.5总暴露的一个非常重要的决定因素,它解释了受试者之间约31%的差异,其次是环境烟草烟雾(10%)、煤/木炉家庭供暖(2%)、其他类型供暖(2%)以及家庭附近的工业厂房位置(1%)。