Arango-Lasprilla Juan Carlos, Rogers Heather, Lengenfelder Jean, Deluca John, Moreno Sonia, Lopera Francisco
Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Laboratory, Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Corporation, 300 Execute Drive, Suite 010 West Orange, NJ 07052, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Jan;21(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Sep 6.
Previous work examining the cortical-subcortical distinction as it relates to cognitive patterns has not typically used genetic confirmation to identify these groups, controlled for age, or used a comprehensive battery to assess specific cognitive abilities. The present study is the first to include only genetically confirmed Familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD) and Huntington's disease (HD) patients to evaluate this distinction. Ten patients with FAD, 11 patients with HD, and 17 matched healthy individuals were compared on a comprehensive neuropsychological battery that included tasks of language, memory, attention, visual-spatial, and executive function. The only neuropsychological measures to differentiate the two clinical groups were Animal Fluency and Letter Fluency; performance on all other measures did not differ. Although the neuropsychological battery adequately distinguished between clinical and healthy individuals, it was not useful to further differentiate the cortical or subcortical nature of the disease. FAD and HD appear to have similar neuropsychological profiles; therefore the cortical versus subcortical cognitive distinction may not be clinically meaningful.
以往研究皮层-皮层下差异与认知模式的关系时,通常未采用基因确认来识别这些群体、未对年龄进行控制,或未使用全面的测试组合来评估特定认知能力。本研究首次仅纳入基因确诊的家族性阿尔茨海默病(FAD)和亨廷顿舞蹈病(HD)患者来评估这种差异。对10名FAD患者、11名HD患者和17名匹配的健康个体进行了一项全面的神经心理学测试组合,其中包括语言、记忆、注意力、视觉空间和执行功能任务。区分这两个临床组的唯一神经心理学指标是动物流畅性和字母流畅性;其他所有指标的表现均无差异。虽然神经心理学测试组合能够充分区分临床个体与健康个体,但对于进一步区分疾病的皮层或皮层下性质并无帮助。FAD和HD似乎具有相似的神经心理学特征;因此,皮层与皮层下认知差异可能在临床上并无意义。