Pühringer F K, Khuenl-Brady K S, Koller J, Mitterschiffthaler G
Clinic for Anaesthesia and General Intensive Care Medicine, University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Anesth Analg. 1992 Jul;75(1):37-40.
The time-course of action and tracheal intubating conditions of rocuronium and succinylcholine under intravenous anesthesia with propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide were studied in 30 patients undergoing outpatient surgery. The neuromuscular effects of both drugs were quantified by recording the indirectly evoked twitch response of the adductor pollicis muscle after ulnar nerve stimulation (0.1 Hz, 0.2 ms supramaximal stimuli). Patients were given either 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium (n = 20) or 1 mg/kg succinylcholine (n = 10) intravenously. Sixty seconds after the administration of the muscle relaxant, the trachea was intubated and the intubating conditions were scored by a "blinded" assessor. Intubating conditions were not different (P = 0.34) between the rocuronium and succinylcholine groups. The onset and duration of neuromuscular blockade were shorter with succinylcholine than with rocuronium. The depression of the twitch response to 5% of control value occurred in 0.8 +/- 0.1 min with 1 mg/kg succinylcholine and 1.2 +/- 0.5 min with 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium (P less than 0.01). The recovery of the twitch response to 25%, 75%, and 90% of its control value was shorter after succinylcholine (P less than 0.001) and occurred at 8.1 +/- 2.6, 10.3 +/- 3.9, 11.3 +/- 4.6 and 25.3 +/- 5.0, 33.1 +/- 5.9, 36.1 +/- 6.3 min after succinylcholine and rocuronium, respectively. Also the time required for spontaneous recovery from 25% to 75% of the control twitch response was significantly shorter (P less than 0.001) after succinylcholine (2.2 +/- 1.4 min) than after rocuronium (7.8 +/- 2.1 min). It is concluded that in spite of the pharmacodynamic differences between succinylcholine and rocuronium, the intubating conditions after administration of both compounds are similar and develop at the same rate.
在30例接受门诊手术的患者中,研究了在丙泊酚、阿芬太尼和氧化亚氮静脉麻醉下罗库溴铵和琥珀胆碱的作用时程及气管插管条件。通过记录尺神经刺激(0.1Hz,0.2ms超强刺激)后拇内收肌的间接诱发抽搐反应,对两种药物的神经肌肉效应进行量化。患者静脉给予0.6mg/kg罗库溴铵(n = 20)或1mg/kg琥珀胆碱(n = 10)。给予肌肉松弛剂60秒后进行气管插管,由一名“盲法”评估者对插管条件进行评分。罗库溴铵组和琥珀胆碱组的插管条件无差异(P = 0.34)。琥珀胆碱的神经肌肉阻滞起效时间和持续时间比罗库溴铵短。1mg/kg琥珀胆碱组抽搐反应降至对照值的5%发生在0.8±0.1分钟,0.6mg/kg罗库溴铵组为1.2±0.5分钟(P<0.01)。琥珀胆碱后抽搐反应恢复至对照值的25%、75%和90%的时间较短(P<0.001),分别发生在给予琥珀胆碱后8.1±2.6、10.3±3.9、11.3±4.6分钟和给予罗库溴铵后25.3±5.0、33.1±5.9、36.1±6.3分钟。同样,从对照抽搐反应的25%自发恢复到75%所需的时间,琥珀胆碱组(2.2±1.4分钟)明显短于罗库溴铵组(7.8±2.1分钟)(P<0.001)。结论是,尽管琥珀胆碱和罗库溴铵在药效学上存在差异,但给予两种化合物后的插管条件相似且发展速度相同。