Goldfarb-Rumyantzev Alexander S, Leypoldt John K, Nelson Natalia, Kutner Nancy G, Cheung Alfred K
University of Utah School of Medicine, and Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City 84112, USA.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Jan;21(1):166-75. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi116. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
The benefits of daily haemodialysis (DHD) compared to conventional three times per week haemodialysis (CHD) have been described in a number of observational studies. Most of these previous studies however have not been performed with rigorous controls.
We performed a crossover study following an A-B-A design: phase A was 4 weeks of thrice weekly dialysis, 3-4 h per treatment (CHD); phase B was 8 weeks of six times/week dialysis, each session being one-half of the usual time (DHD) and phase A with 4 weeks of thrice weekly dialysis (CHD) was repeated. Patients characteristics: n=12, six males; age 52+/-18 years, six diabetics.
Weekly single-pool Kt/V, equilibrated Kt/V and standard Kt/V of urea, and beta-2-microglobulin clearance values were greater during DHD. Eight of 12 patients who completed the study reported symptomatic benefits from DHD that partially or completely disappeared during the second period of CHD. Quality of life of patients improved during DHD. Three patients had problems with arteriovenous access during DHD. Average blood pressure was lower during DHD (systolic 139.5+/-22.7 mmHg) compared to the initial (147.7+/-21.4 mmHg, P<0.001) and last (146.4+/-20.0 mmHg, P<0.005) CHD periods. No significant changes in predialysis haemoglobin and the serum concentration of albumin, phosphate, beta-2-microglobulin or B-type natriuretic peptides (BNP) were observed, although BNP trended downward during DHD and returned to baseline level during the second period of CHD. The dose of erythropoietin did not change significantly. Patient compliance with the dialysis schedule was lower during DHD. Dialysis staff perceived an increased workload but felt that the patients benefited medically from DHD.
The results of this cross-over study suggest symptomatic benefits and decrease in blood pressure, but there are potential problems with compliance and vascular access during DHD.
多项观察性研究描述了每日血液透析(DHD)相较于传统每周三次血液透析(CHD)的益处。然而,此前大多数此类研究并未进行严格对照。
我们采用A - B - A设计进行了一项交叉研究:A阶段为每周三次透析,每次治疗3 - 4小时,共4周(CHD);B阶段为每周六次透析,每次时长为通常时长的一半,共8周(DHD),然后重复4周每周三次透析的A阶段(CHD)。患者特征:n = 12,男性6名;年龄52 ± 18岁,糖尿病患者6名。
DHD期间,每周单池Kt/V、平衡Kt/V和尿素的标准Kt/V以及β2 - 微球蛋白清除值更高。完成研究的12名患者中有8名报告称DHD带来了症状改善,这些改善在第二个CHD阶段部分或完全消失。患者在DHD期间生活质量有所提高。3名患者在DHD期间出现动静脉通路问题。与初始(147.7 ± 21.4 mmHg,P < 0.001)和最后(146.4 ± 20.0 mmHg,P < 0.005)CHD阶段相比,DHD期间平均血压较低(收缩压139.5 ± 22.7 mmHg)。未观察到透析前血红蛋白以及白蛋白、磷酸盐、β2 - 微球蛋白或B型利钠肽(BNP)血清浓度有显著变化,尽管BNP在DHD期间呈下降趋势,并在第二个CHD阶段恢复至基线水平。促红细胞生成素剂量无显著变化。患者对透析方案的依从性在DHD期间较低。透析工作人员感觉到工作量增加,但认为患者在医学上从DHD中受益。
这项交叉研究的结果表明DHD有症状改善和血压降低的益处,但DHD期间在依从性和血管通路方面存在潜在问题。