Suppr超能文献

颈椎或腰椎间盘及小关节退变现有分级系统综述。

Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration.

作者信息

Kettler Annette, Wilke Hans-Joachim

机构信息

Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2006 Jun;15(6):705-18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0954-y. Epub 2005 Sep 20.

Abstract

The aim of this literature review was to present and to evaluate all grading systems for cervical and lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration, which are accessible from the MEDLINE database. A MEDLINE search was conducted to select all articles presenting own grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc or facet joint degeneration. To give an overview, these grading systems were listed systematically depending on the spinal region they refer to and the methodology used for grading. All systems were checked for reliability tests and those recommended for use having an interobserver Kappa or Intraclass Correlation Coefficient >0.60 if disc degeneration was graded and >0.40 if facet joint degeneration was graded. MEDLINE search revealed 42 different grading systems. Thirty of these were used to grade lumbar spine degeneration, ten were used to grade cervical spine degeneration and two were used to grade both. Thus, the grading systems for the lumbar spine represented the vast majority of all 42 grading systems. Interobserver reliability tests were found for 12 grading systems. Based on their Kappa or Intraclass Correlation Coefficients nine of these could be recommended for use and three could not. All other systems could neither be recommended nor not be recommended since reliability tests were missing. These systems should therefore first be tested before use. The design of the grading systems varied considerably. Five grading systems were beginning with the lowest degree of degeneration, 37, however, with the normal, not degenerated state. A 5-grade scale was used in six systems, a 4-grade scale in 24, a 3-grade scale in eight and a 2-grade scale in three systems. In 15 cases the normal, not degenerated state was assigned to "grade 0", in another 15 cases, however, this state was assigned to "grade 1". This wide variety in the design of the grading systems makes comparisons difficult and may easily lead to confusion. We would therefore recommend to define certain standards. Our suggestion would be to use a scale of three to five grades, to begin the scale with the not degenerated state and to assign this state to "grade 0".

摘要

本综述的目的是展示并评估MEDLINE数据库中可获取的所有关于颈椎和腰椎间盘及小关节退变的分级系统。通过MEDLINE检索,筛选出所有介绍颈椎或腰椎间盘或小关节退变自身分级系统的文章。为了给出一个概述,这些分级系统根据其所涉及的脊柱区域和分级所采用的方法进行了系统罗列。所有系统均经过可靠性测试检查,对于椎间盘退变分级,观察者间Kappa值或组内相关系数>0.60、小关节退变分级>0.40的系统推荐使用。MEDLINE检索共发现42种不同的分级系统。其中30种用于腰椎退变分级,10种用于颈椎退变分级,2种用于两者。因此,腰椎分级系统占所有42种分级系统的绝大多数。12种分级系统进行了观察者间可靠性测试。基于其Kappa值或组内相关系数,其中9种可推荐使用,3种不可推荐使用。所有其他系统由于缺少可靠性测试,既不能推荐也不能不推荐使用。因此,这些系统在使用前应首先进行测试。分级系统的设计差异很大。5种分级系统从最低程度的退变开始,然而,37种从正常、未退变状态开始。6种系统采用5级量表,24种采用4级量表,8种采用3级量表,3种采用2级量表。在15例中,正常、未退变状态被定为“0级”,然而,在另外15例中,该状态被定为“1级”。分级系统设计的这种广泛差异使得比较困难,且很容易导致混淆。因此,我们建议定义某些标准。我们的建议是使用三到五级量表,从未退变状态开始量表,并将该状态定为“0级”。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Intervertebral disc degeneration.椎间盘退变。
Eur Spine J. 1993 Mar;1(4):205-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00298361.
4
Anatomical and clinical studies on lumbar disc degeneration.腰椎间盘退变的解剖学与临床研究
Acta Orthop Scand. 1949;19(2):222-42, illust. doi: 10.3109/17453674908991095.
5
Rheumatism in miners. II. X-ray study.矿工中的风湿病。II. X光研究。
Br J Ind Med. 1952 Jul;9(3):197-207. doi: 10.1136/oem.9.3.197.
7

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验