Olthuis Gert, Dekkers Wim
Department of Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, The Netherlands.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2005;26(4):307-37. doi: 10.1007/s11017-005-4487-5.
The main measure of quality of life is well-being. The aim of this article is to compare insights about well-being from contemporary philosophy with the practice-related opinions of palliative care professionals. In the first part of the paper two philosophical theories on well-being are introduced: Sumner's theory of authentic happiness and Griffin's theory of prudential perfectionism. The second part presents opinions derived from interviews with 19 professional palliative caregivers. Both the well-being of patients and the well-being of the carers themselves are considered in this empirical exploration. In the third part the attention shifts from the description of "well-being" to prescriptions for the promotion of well-being. Our interview data are analysed in light of the theories of Sumner and Griffin for clues to the promotion of "well-being." The analysis (1) underscores the subject-relativity of well-being, (2) points out that values that are considered important in every life still seem to be relevant (at least in palliative care practice), and (3) shows the importance of living a certain sort of life when aiming to enhance dying patients' well-being.
生活质量的主要衡量标准是幸福。本文的目的是将当代哲学中关于幸福的见解与姑息治疗专业人员与实践相关的观点进行比较。在论文的第一部分,介绍了两种关于幸福的哲学理论:萨姆纳的真实幸福理论和格里芬的审慎完美主义理论。第二部分呈现了对19名专业姑息护理人员访谈得出的观点。在这一实证探索中,既考虑了患者的幸福,也考虑了护理人员自身的幸福。在第三部分,关注点从对“幸福”的描述转向促进幸福的建议。我们根据萨姆纳和格里芬的理论分析访谈数据,以寻找促进“幸福”的线索。分析结果如下:(1)强调幸福的主体相对性;(2)指出在每个人的生活中被认为重要的价值观似乎仍然相关(至少在姑息治疗实践中如此);(3)表明在旨在提高临终患者的幸福时,过某种特定生活的重要性。