• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卷尾猴(僧帽猴)多余的食物搜寻行为:元认知的失败?

Redundant food searches by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a failure of metacognition?

作者信息

Paukner Annika, Anderson James R, Fujita Kazuo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2006 Apr;9(2):110-7. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0007-2. Epub 2005 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-005-0007-2
PMID:16184375
Abstract

This study investigated capuchin monkeys' understanding of their own visual search behavior as a means to gather information. Five monkeys were presented with three tubes that could be visually searched to determine the location of a bait. The bait's visibility was experimentally manipulated, and the monkeys' spontaneous visual searches before tube selection were analyzed. In Experiment 1, three monkeys selected the baited tube significantly above chance; however, the monkeys also searched transparent tubes. In Experiment 2, a bent tube in which food was never visible was introduced. When the bent tube was baited, the monkeys failed to deduce the bait location and responded randomly. They also continued to look into the bent tube despite not gaining any pertinent information from it. The capuchin monkeys' behavior contrasts with the efficient employment of visual search behavior reported in humans, apes and macaques. This difference is consistent with species-related variations in metacognitive abilities, although other explanations are also possible.

摘要

本研究调查了卷尾猴对自身视觉搜索行为作为一种获取信息手段的理解。给五只猴子呈现三根管子,它们可以通过视觉搜索来确定诱饵的位置。诱饵的可见性通过实验进行操控,并对猴子在选择管子之前的自发视觉搜索进行了分析。在实验1中,三只猴子选择有诱饵的管子的概率显著高于随机水平;然而,猴子们也会搜索透明管子。在实验2中,引入了一根弯曲的管子,在其中食物永远不可见。当弯曲的管子中有诱饵时,猴子们无法推断出诱饵的位置,而是随机做出反应。尽管从弯曲的管子中没有获得任何相关信息,它们仍然继续看向该管子。卷尾猴的行为与人类、猿类和猕猴中所报道的有效运用视觉搜索行为形成对比。这种差异与元认知能力的物种相关差异一致,尽管也可能有其他解释。

相似文献

1
Redundant food searches by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a failure of metacognition?卷尾猴(僧帽猴)多余的食物搜寻行为:元认知的失败?
Anim Cogn. 2006 Apr;9(2):110-7. doi: 10.1007/s10071-005-0007-2. Epub 2005 Sep 24.
2
Inferences about the location of food in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in two sensory modalities.卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)通过两种感官模式对食物位置的推断
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):156-66. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.156.
3
Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)对依次呈现的食物项目的数量判断
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0174-z. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
4
Analogical reasoning in a capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的类比推理
J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):167-75. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.2.167.
5
Learning from others' mistakes in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).卷尾猴(僧帽猴)从其他同类的错误中学习。
Anim Cogn. 2008 Oct;11(4):599-609. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0150-7. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
6
Spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) follow gaze around barriers: evidence for perspective taking?蜘蛛猴(Ateles geoffroyi)和卷尾猴(Cebus apella)能绕过障碍物追踪目光方向:这是采取视角的证据吗?
J Comp Psychol. 2009 Nov;123(4):368-74. doi: 10.1037/a0017079.
7
Transport of tools to food sites in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)将工具运输到食物地点的行为
Anim Cogn. 2004 Jul;7(3):193-8. doi: 10.1007/s10071-004-0213-3. Epub 2004 Mar 12.
8
What perceptual rules do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) follow in completing partly occluded figures?卷尾猴(僧帽猴)在完成部分遮挡图形时遵循哪些感知规则?
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Oct;31(4):387-98. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.4.387.
9
Metamemory in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).簇绒卷尾猴(僧帽猴)的元记忆
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jul;12(4):575-85. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0217-0. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
10
Ordinal representation of numeric quantities by brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).棕色卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)对数字数量的序数表征。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jan;31(1):79-94. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.31.1.79.

引用本文的文献

1
Metacognition in nonhuman primates: a review of current knowledge.非人类灵长类动物的元认知:当前知识综述
Primates. 2025 Jan;66(1):9-25. doi: 10.1007/s10329-024-01169-x. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
2
Information-seeking in mice (Mus musculus) during visual discrimination: study using a distractor elimination paradigm.小鼠(小家鼠)在视觉辨别过程中的信息寻求:使用干扰消除范式的研究
Anim Cogn. 2024 Dec 2;27(1):81. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01920-3.
3
Flexible information-seeking in chimpanzees.黑猩猩灵活的信息获取方式。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105898. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105898. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
Inferential reasoning abilities in wild-caught bumblebees.野生熊蜂的推理能力。
Biol Lett. 2024 Jun;20(6):20230561. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0561. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
5
Metacognition in wild Japanese macaques: cost and stakes influencing information-seeking behavior.野生日本猕猴的元认知:成本和利害关系影响信息寻求行为。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 5;27(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01851-z.
6
Rats did not show evidence of prospective information-seeking: a pilot study.大鼠未表现出前瞻性信息寻求的证据:一项初步研究。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Dec 4;17:1253780. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1253780. eCollection 2023.
7
Don't look back on failure: spontaneous uncertainty monitoring in chimpanzees.不要回顾失败:黑猩猩的自发不确定性监测。
Learn Behav. 2023 Dec;51(4):402-412. doi: 10.3758/s13420-023-00581-5. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
8
Information seeking in western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).西部低地大猩猩(Gorilla gorilla gorilla)的信息搜寻行为。
Learn Behav. 2023 Mar;51(1):59-72. doi: 10.3758/s13420-022-00554-0. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
Monkey Metacognition Could Generate More Insight.猴子的元认知可能会产生更多的洞察力。
Anim Behav Cogn. 2019 Nov;6(4):230-235. doi: 10.26451/abc.06.04.02.2019.
10
The Cognitive Architecture of Uncertainty.不确定性的认知架构
Anim Behav Cogn. 2019 Nov;6(4):236-246. doi: 10.26451/abc.06.04.03.2019.