Suppr超能文献

使用快速扩展覆盖和流入/流出饱和技术对门控和非门控快速多层黑血颈动脉成像进行比较。

Comparison of gated and non-gated fast multislice black-blood carotid imaging using rapid extended coverage and inflow/outflow saturation techniques.

作者信息

Mani Venkatesh, Itskovich Vitalii V, Aguiar Silvia H, Mizsei Gabor, Aguinaldo Juan Gilberto S, Samber Daniel D, Macaluso Frank M, Fayad Zahi A

机构信息

Imaging Science Laboratories, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029-6574, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Nov;22(5):628-33. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20428.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To comparatively analyze two fast in vivo multislice black-blood carotid artery vessel wall imaging techniques with and without cardiac gating.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight subjects with carotid artery atherosclerosis, and four healthy subjects were studied using two black-blood multislice techniques: rapid extended coverage double inversion recovery (REX-DIR), and inflow/outflow saturation band (IOSB) rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) multislice acquisitions. Quantitative, qualitative, and morphometric analyses were performed on images.

RESULTS

Gating produced significantly lower values for the REX-DIR sequence with respect to signal intensity in muscle and the carotid artery wall, whereas it had no effect on flow suppression compared to non-gated images. For the IOSB sequences, gating had no significant effect on signal intensity of muscle and the carotid artery wall, but worsened flow suppression. REX-DIR and IOSB sequences were statistically different with respect to signal intensity of muscle (with REX-DIR sequences having lower values), while no statistical significance was observed for flow suppression and wall delineation. A morphologic analysis of the vessel wall and lumen comparing REX-DIR gated, IOSB gated, REX-DIR non-gated, and IOSB non-gated sequences revealed no significant differences between the acquisition techniques tested.

CONCLUSION

Non-gated sequences may be used instead of gated sequences in atherosclerotic vessel wall imaging without compromising image quality. This may shorten examination time and improve patient comfort.

摘要

目的

比较分析两种快速的体内多层黑血颈动脉血管壁成像技术,一种采用心脏门控,另一种不采用心脏门控。

材料与方法

对8名患有颈动脉粥样硬化的受试者和4名健康受试者使用两种黑血多层技术进行研究:快速扩展覆盖双反转恢复(REX-DIR),以及流入/流出饱和带(IOSB)快速采集弛豫增强(RARE)多层采集。对图像进行定量、定性和形态学分析。

结果

对于REX-DIR序列,门控使肌肉和颈动脉壁的信号强度值显著降低,而与非门控图像相比,其对血流抑制无影响。对于IOSB序列,门控对肌肉和颈动脉壁的信号强度无显著影响,但会加重血流抑制。REX-DIR和IOSB序列在肌肉信号强度方面存在统计学差异(REX-DIR序列的值较低),而在血流抑制和壁勾勒方面未观察到统计学意义。对血管壁和管腔进行形态学分析,比较REX-DIR门控、IOSB门控、REX-DIR非门控和IOSB非门控序列,结果显示所测试的采集技术之间无显著差异。

结论

在动脉粥样硬化血管壁成像中,非门控序列可替代门控序列使用,而不影响图像质量。这可能会缩短检查时间并提高患者舒适度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验