• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用个体层面数据改进生态推理。

Improving ecological inference using individual-level data.

作者信息

Jackson Christopher, Best Nicky, Richardson Sylvia

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, U.K.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2006 Jun 30;25(12):2136-59. doi: 10.1002/sim.2370.

DOI:10.1002/sim.2370
PMID:16217847
Abstract

In typical small-area studies of health and environment we wish to make inference on the relationship between individual-level quantities using aggregate, or ecological, data. Such ecological inference is often subject to bias and imprecision, due to the lack of individual-level information in the data. Conversely, individual-level survey data often have insufficient power to study small-area variations in health. Such problems can be reduced by supplementing the aggregate-level data with small samples of data from individuals within the areas, which directly link exposures and outcomes. We outline a hierarchical model framework for estimating individual-level associations using a combination of aggregate and individual data. We perform a comprehensive simulation study, under a variety of realistic conditions, to determine when aggregate data are sufficient for accurate inference, and when we also require individual-level information. Finally, we illustrate the methods in a case study investigating the relationship between limiting long-term illness, ethnicity and income in London.

摘要

在典型的健康与环境小区域研究中,我们希望利用汇总数据或生态数据来推断个体层面变量之间的关系。由于数据中缺乏个体层面的信息,这种生态推断往往存在偏差且不够精确。相反,个体层面的调查数据通常没有足够的能力来研究健康状况在小区域内的差异。通过用区域内个体的小样本数据补充汇总层面的数据,可以减少这些问题,这些个体数据能直接将暴露因素和结果联系起来。我们概述了一个层次模型框架,用于结合汇总数据和个体数据来估计个体层面的关联。我们在各种现实条件下进行了全面的模拟研究,以确定何时汇总数据足以进行准确推断,以及何时我们还需要个体层面的信息。最后,我们在一个案例研究中展示了这些方法,该案例研究调查了伦敦地区长期慢性病、种族和收入之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Improving ecological inference using individual-level data.利用个体层面数据改进生态推理。
Stat Med. 2006 Jun 30;25(12):2136-59. doi: 10.1002/sim.2370.
2
A hybrid model for reducing ecological bias.一种用于减少生态偏差的混合模型。
Biostatistics. 2008 Jan;9(1):1-17. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm022. Epub 2007 Jun 16.
3
Health-exposure modeling and the ecological fallacy.健康暴露建模与生态谬误。
Biostatistics. 2006 Jul;7(3):438-55. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj017. Epub 2006 Jan 20.
4
Overcoming ecologic bias using the two-phase study design.使用两阶段研究设计克服生态学偏倚。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Apr 15;167(8):908-16. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm386. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
5
Hierarchical models for combining ecological and case-control data.用于整合生态数据和病例对照数据的分层模型。
Biometrics. 2007 Mar;63(1):128-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00673.x.
6
Linkage failures in ecological studies.生态研究中的连锁失败。
World Health Stat Q. 1995;48(2):78-84.
7
An innovative application of Bayesian disease mapping methods to patient safety research: a Canadian adverse medical event study.贝叶斯疾病映射方法在患者安全研究中的创新应用:一项加拿大不良医疗事件研究。
Stat Med. 2006 Dec 15;25(23):3960-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.2507.
8
Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.纵向临床试验中个体患者数据与汇总数据的Meta分析。
Clin Trials. 2009 Feb;6(1):16-27. doi: 10.1177/1740774508100984.
9
Geographic-based ecological correlation studies using supplemental case-control data.利用补充性病例对照数据进行的基于地理的生态相关性研究。
Stat Med. 2008 Mar 15;27(6):864-87. doi: 10.1002/sim.2979.
10
Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: an ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors.解释出行步行方面的社会经济地位差异:个体、社会和环境因素的生态分析
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(6):1013-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Unbiased temperature-related mortality estimates using weekly and monthly health data: a new method for environmental epidemiology and climate impact studies.使用周和月健康数据进行无偏温度相关死亡率估计:环境流行病学和气候影响研究的新方法。
Lancet Planet Health. 2024 Oct;8(10):e766-e777. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00212-2.
2
County-level associations between drinking water PFAS contamination and COVID-19 mortality in the United States.美国县级饮用水中全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)污染与新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)死亡率之间的关联。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025 May;35(3):478-485. doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00723-5. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
3
Childhood PM exposure and upward mobility in the United States.
儿童时期 PM 暴露与美国的向上流动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 17;121(38):e2401882121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401882121. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
4
Combining aggregate and individual-level data to estimate individual-level associations between air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States.结合总体数据和个体层面数据,以估计美国空气污染与新冠肺炎死亡率之间的个体层面关联。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 2;3(8):e0002178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002178. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparing the use of aggregate data and various methods of integrating individual patient data to network meta-analysis and its application to first-line ART.比较汇总数据的使用和整合个体患者数据的各种方法对网络荟萃分析及其在一线 ART 中的应用。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 30;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01254-5.
6
Bayesian data fusion: Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding using informative priors based on secondary data.贝叶斯数据分析融合:基于二次数据的信息先验概率对未测量混杂因素的概率敏感性分析。
Biometrics. 2022 Jun;78(2):730-741. doi: 10.1111/biom.13436. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
7
When does the use of individual patient data in network meta-analysis make a difference? A simulation study.网络荟萃分析中使用个体患者数据何时会产生影响?一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01198-2.
8
Air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States: Strengths and limitations of an ecological regression analysis.空气污染与美国新冠肺炎死亡率:生态回归分析的优势与局限
Sci Adv. 2020 Nov 4;6(45). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4049. Print 2020 Nov.
9
Multilevel network meta-regression for population-adjusted treatment comparisons.用于人群调整治疗比较的多水平网络meta回归
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2020 Jun;183(3):1189-1210. doi: 10.1111/rssa.12579. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
10
Combining individual and aggregated data to investigate the role of socioeconomic disparities on cancer burden in Italy.结合个体和汇总数据研究意大利社会经济差异对癌症负担的作用。
Stat Med. 2020 Jan 15;39(1):26-44. doi: 10.1002/sim.8392. Epub 2019 Nov 20.