• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用实时聚合酶链反应对通过三种不同方法提取的真菌DNA进行定量测量。

Quantitative measurement of fungal DNA extracted by three different methods using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

作者信息

Kabir Shaila, Rajendran Narasimmalu, Amemiya Takashi, Itoh Kiminori

机构信息

Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, 79-7 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan.

出版信息

J Biosci Bioeng. 2003;96(4):337-43. doi: 10.1016/S1389-1723(03)90133-2.

DOI:10.1016/S1389-1723(03)90133-2
PMID:16233533
Abstract

Quantification of fungal populations in the environment is important for gaining a better understanding of various microbial processes. Recently, the development of real-time quantitative PCR (RTQ-PCR) has eliminated the variability associated with conventional quantitative PCR, thereby allowing the routine and reliable quantification of PCR products. Thus, in this present study, RTQ-PCR was used to quantify the fungal target DNA extracted by three commonly used DNA extraction protocols (bead mill homogenization, grinding in the presence of liquid nitrogen, and hot detergent SDS based enzymatic lysis combined with bead beating) to determine the suitability of the quantification of target DNA. For the purpose of this study, pure culture of Aspergillus fumigatus (model organism), sterilized soil seeded with a known amount ofA. fumigatus (model soil system), and woodland and grassland soil samples (environmental samples) were chosen to extract DNA by the above three different protocols. The extracted DNA was then quantified by spectroscopy and a RTQ-PCR system. 18S rDNA specific universal fungal primers were used to quantify the target part and then amplification products were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis. Standard curves used for the quantification by RTQ-PCR revealed strong linear relationships (R2=0.9994 for the primer pair NS1 and NS2 and 0.9938 for the primer pair nu-SSU-0817 and nu-SSU-1196) with a higher amplification efficiency, e=0.983 for the primer pair NS1 and NS2 and 0.956 for the primer pair nu-SSU-0817 and nu-SSU-1196. Although for pure culture the hot detergent SDS based enzymatic lysis combined with bead beating method showed the highest target DNA copy number (1.5 x 10(9) copies/microl), for the model soil system and both environmental samples the bead beating method was found to be suitable on the basis of the high target DNA copy numbers (6.16 x 10(8) and 2.7 x 10(8) copies/microl for woodland and grassland, respectively), high DNA yield (6.4 microg/g and 1.8 microg/g of soil for woodland and grassland, respectively), and high recovery on the basis of the target DNA copy number (39.2%), suggesting an overall high extraction efficiency.

摘要

对环境中的真菌种群进行定量分析,对于更好地理解各种微生物过程至关重要。最近,实时定量PCR(RTQ-PCR)技术的发展消除了与传统定量PCR相关的变异性,从而使PCR产物的常规可靠定量成为可能。因此,在本研究中,RTQ-PCR被用于对通过三种常用DNA提取方案(珠磨匀浆法、液氮研磨法以及基于热去污剂SDS的酶解结合珠磨法)提取的真菌目标DNA进行定量,以确定目标DNA定量的适用性。为了本研究的目的,选择烟曲霉纯培养物(模式生物)、接种了已知量烟曲霉的灭菌土壤(模式土壤系统)以及林地和草地土壤样本(环境样本),通过上述三种不同方案提取DNA。然后通过光谱学和RTQ-PCR系统对提取的DNA进行定量。使用18S rDNA特异性通用真菌引物对目标部分进行定量,然后通过琼脂糖凝胶电泳验证扩增产物。用于RTQ-PCR定量的标准曲线显示出很强的线性关系(引物对NS1和NS2的R2 = 0.9994,引物对nu-SSU-0817和nu-SSU-1196的R2 = 0.9938),且扩增效率较高,引物对NS1和NS2的e = 0.983,引物对nu-SSU-0817和nu-SSU-1196的e = 0.956。尽管对于纯培养物,基于热去污剂SDS的酶解结合珠磨法显示出最高的目标DNA拷贝数(1.5×10⁹拷贝/微升),但对于模式土壤系统和两个环境样本,基于高目标DNA拷贝数(林地和草地分别为6.16×10⁸和2.7×10⁸拷贝/微升)、高DNA产量(林地和草地土壤分别为6.4微克/克和1.8微克/克)以及基于目标DNA拷贝数的高回收率(39.2%),发现珠磨法是合适的,表明总体提取效率较高。

相似文献

1
Quantitative measurement of fungal DNA extracted by three different methods using real-time polymerase chain reaction.使用实时聚合酶链反应对通过三种不同方法提取的真菌DNA进行定量测量。
J Biosci Bioeng. 2003;96(4):337-43. doi: 10.1016/S1389-1723(03)90133-2.
2
Real-time quantitative PCR assay on bacterial DNA: In a model soil system and environmental samples.细菌DNA的实时定量PCR检测:在模型土壤系统和环境样本中。
J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2003 Apr;49(2):101-9. doi: 10.2323/jgam.49.101.
3
Detection and quantification of Entomophaga maimaiga resting spores in forest soil using real-time PCR.利用实时荧光定量PCR检测和定量森林土壤中舞毒蛾噬虫霉休眠孢子
Mycol Res. 2007 Mar;111(Pt 3):324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
4
Optimization of methods for detecting Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in environmental samples using quantitative, real-time PCR.使用定量实时PCR优化环境样本中副结核分枝杆菌的检测方法
J Microbiol Methods. 2007 Apr;69(1):154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.12.017. Epub 2006 Dec 30.
5
A new semi-nested PCR protocol to amplify large 18S rRNA gene fragments for PCR-DGGE analysis of soil fungal communities.一种用于扩增大型18S rRNA基因片段的新型半巢式PCR方案,用于土壤真菌群落的PCR-DGGE分析。
J Microbiol Methods. 2006 Apr;65(1):63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.06.014. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
6
Critical points of DNA quantification by real-time PCR--effects of DNA extraction method and sample matrix on quantification of genetically modified organisms.实时荧光定量PCR法进行DNA定量的关键点——DNA提取方法和样品基质对转基因生物定量的影响
BMC Biotechnol. 2006 Aug 14;6:37. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-6-37.
7
Detection and quantification of copper-denitrifying bacteria by quantitative competitive PCR.通过定量竞争PCR检测和定量反硝化铜细菌
J Microbiol Methods. 2004 Nov;59(2):199-210. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.07.008.
8
Detection and quantification of phnE gene from oil-contaminated soil samples by competitive quantitative PCR.通过竞争性定量PCR检测和定量分析石油污染土壤样品中的phnE基因。
Microbiol Res. 2007;162(4):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2006.01.013. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
9
Development of AFLP-derived, functionally specific markers for environmental persistence studies of fungal strains.开发用于真菌菌株环境持久性研究的AFLP衍生功能特异性标记。
Can J Microbiol. 2006 May;52(5):451-61. doi: 10.1139/w05-140.
10
DGGE with genomic DNA: suitable for detection of numerically important organisms but not for identification of the most abundant organisms.使用基因组DNA的变性梯度凝胶电泳:适用于检测数量上占重要地位的微生物,但不适用于鉴定最丰富的微生物。
Water Res. 2008 Dec;42(20):5002-10. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Soil and leaf litter metaproteomics-a brief guideline from sampling to understanding.土壤和落叶层宏蛋白质组学——从采样到理解的简要指南
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016 Nov;92(11). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw180. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
2
Identification of RNase-resistant RNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae extracts: Separation from chromosomal DNA by selective precipitation.酿酒酵母提取物中抗核糖核酸酶RNA的鉴定:通过选择性沉淀从染色体DNA中分离出来。
Anal Biochem. 2016 Jan 1;492:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
3
High fungal diversity and abundance recovered in the deep-sea sediments of the Pacific Ocean.
在太平洋深海沉积物中恢复了高真菌多样性和丰度。
Microb Ecol. 2014 Nov;68(4):688-98. doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0448-8. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
4
Tracking dynamics of plant biomass composting by changes in substrate structure, microbial community, and enzyme activity.追踪植物生物质堆肥过程中基质结构、微生物群落和酶活性变化的动态。
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012 Apr 10;5(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-20.
5
Validation and application of a PCR primer set to quantify fungal communities in the soil environment by real-time quantitative PCR.通过实时定量 PCR 定量土壤环境中真菌群落的 PCR 引物的验证和应用。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024166. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
6
Accuracy, precision, and method detection limits of quantitative PCR for airborne bacteria and fungi.定量 PCR 检测空气中细菌和真菌的准确性、精密度和方法检测限。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Nov;76(21):7004-12. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01240-10. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
7
Microbial community shifts influence patterns in tropical forest nitrogen fixation.微生物群落变化影响热带森林氮固定模式。
Oecologia. 2010 Oct;164(2):521-31. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1649-6. Epub 2010 May 9.
8
Aspergillosis of biliary tract after liver transplantation: a case report.肝移植后胆道曲霉病:病例报告。
Mycopathologia. 2010 Aug;170(2):117-21. doi: 10.1007/s11046-010-9300-y. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
9
Assessment of soil microbial community structure by use of taxon-specific quantitative PCR assays.使用分类群特异性定量PCR分析法评估土壤微生物群落结构。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jul;71(7):4117-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4117-4120.2005.