• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乙二醇暴露:院外管理的循证共识指南

Ethylene glycol exposure: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.

作者信息

Caravati E Martin, Erdman Andrew R, Christianson Gwenn, Manoguerra Anthony S, Booze Lisa L, Woolf Alan D, Olson Kent R, Chyka Peter A, Scharman Elizabeth J, Wax Paul M, Keyes Daniel C, Troutman William G

机构信息

American Association of Poison Control Centers, Washington, DC 20016, USA.

出版信息

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005;43(5):327-45. doi: 10.1080/07313820500184971.

DOI:10.1080/07313820500184971
PMID:16235508
Abstract

In 2002, poison centers in the US reported 5816 human exposures to ethylene glycol. A guideline that effectively determines the threshold dose for emergency department referral and need for pre-hospital decontamination could potentially avoid unnecessary emergency department visits, reduce health care costs, optimize patient outcome, and reduce life disruption for patients and caregivers. An evidence-based expert consensus process was used to create this guideline. Relevant articles were abstracted by a trained physician researcher. The first draft of the guideline was created by the primary author. The entire panel discussed and refined the guideline before distribution to secondary reviewers for comment. The panel then made changes based on the secondary review comments. The objective of this guideline is to assist poison center personnel in the out-of-hospital triage and initial management of patients with a suspected exposure to ethylene glycol by (1) describing the process by which the exposure might be evaluated, (2) identifying the key decision elements in managing the case, (3) providing clear and practical recommendations that reflect the current state of knowledge, and (4) identifying needs for research. This guideline is based on an assessment of current scientific and clinical information. The panel recognizes that specific patient care decisions may be at variance with this guideline and are the prerogative of the patient and health professionals providing care, considering all of the circumstances involved. Recommendations are in chronological order of likely clinical use. The grade of recommendation is in parentheses. (1) A patient with exposure due to suspected self-harm, misuse, or potentially malicious administration should be referred to an emergency department immediately regardless of the dose reported (Grade D). (2) Patients with inhalation exposures will not develop systemic toxicity and can be managed out-of-hospital if asymptomatic (Grade B). Patients with clinically significant mucous membrane irritation should be referred for evaluation (Grade D). (3) Decontamination of dermal exposures should include routine cleansing with mild soap and water. Removal of contact lenses and immediate irrigation with room temperature tap water is recommended for ocular exposures. All patients with symptoms of eye injury should be referred for an ophthalmologic exam (Grade D). (4) Patients with symptoms of ethylene glycol poisoning should be referred immediately for evaluation regardless of the reported dose (Grade C). (5) The absence of symptoms shortly after ingestion does not exclude a potentially toxic dose and should not be used as a triage criterion (Grade C). (6) Adults who ingest a "swallow" (10-30 mL), children who ingest more than a witnessed taste or lick, or if the amount is unknown of most ethylene glycol products should be referred immediately for evaluation. The potential toxic volume of dilute solutions (e.g., concentration <20%) is larger and can be estimated by a formula in the text (Grade C). (7) A witnessed taste or lick only by a child, or an adult who unintentionally drinks and then expectorates the product without swallowing, does not need referral (Grade C). (8) Referral is not needed if it has been >24 hours since a potentially toxic unintentional exposure, the patient has been asymptomatic, and no alcohol was co-ingested (Grade D). (9) Gastrointestinal decontamination with ipecac syrup, gastric lavage or activated charcoal is not recommended. Transportation to an emergency department should not be delayed for any decontamination procedures (Grade D). (10) Patients meeting referral criteria should be evaluated at a hospital emergency department rather than a clinic. A facility that can quickly obtain an ethylene glycol serum concentration and has alcohol or fomepizole therapy available is preferred. This referral should be guided by local poison center procedures and community resources (Grade D). (11) The administration of alcohol, fomepizole, thiamine, or pyridoxine is not recommended in the out-of-hospital setting (Grade D).

摘要

2002年,美国毒物控制中心报告了5816起乙二醇人体暴露事件。一项能有效确定急诊科转诊阈值剂量以及院前去污需求的指南,有可能避免不必要的急诊科就诊,降低医疗成本,优化患者治疗效果,并减少患者及其护理人员的生活干扰。本指南采用循证专家共识流程制定。相关文章由一名经过培训的内科医师研究员进行摘要。指南初稿由第一作者撰写。在分发给二级审阅者征求意见之前,整个小组对指南进行了讨论和完善。然后,小组根据二级审阅意见进行了修改。本指南的目的是通过以下方式协助毒物控制中心人员对疑似乙二醇暴露患者进行院外分诊和初始处理:(1)描述评估暴露情况的过程;(2)确定处理该病例的关键决策要素;(3)提供反映当前知识水平的清晰实用建议;(4)确定研究需求。本指南基于对当前科学和临床信息的评估。小组认识到,特定的患者护理决策可能与本指南不一致,在考虑所有相关情况后,这是患者和提供护理的卫生专业人员的特权。建议按照可能的临床使用时间顺序排列。推荐等级在括号内。(1)因疑似自残、误用或潜在恶意投药而暴露的患者,无论报告的剂量如何,均应立即转诊至急诊科(D级)。(2)吸入性暴露患者不会出现全身毒性,如无症状可在院外处理(B级)。有临床显著黏膜刺激症状的患者应转诊进行评估(D级)。(3)皮肤暴露的去污应包括用温和肥皂和水进行常规清洗。眼部暴露建议摘除隐形眼镜并用室温自来水立即冲洗。所有有眼部损伤症状的患者应转诊进行眼科检查(D级)。(4)有乙二醇中毒症状的患者,无论报告的剂量如何,均应立即转诊进行评估(C级)。(5)摄入后不久无症状并不排除潜在中毒剂量,不应将其用作分诊标准(C级)。(6)摄入“一口”(10 - 30毫升)的成年人、摄入超过目睹的一口量或舔舐量的儿童,或如果乙二醇产品的摄入量未知,均应立即转诊进行评估。稀释溶液(如浓度<20%)的潜在中毒量较大,可通过文中公式估算(C级)。(7)仅儿童目睹的舔舐,或成年人无意中饮用后吐出产品未吞咽,无需转诊(C级)。(8)如果潜在有毒的无意暴露已超过24小时,患者无症状且未同时摄入酒精,则无需转诊(D级)。(9)不建议用吐根糖浆、洗胃或活性炭进行胃肠道去污。不应因任何去污程序而延迟送往急诊科(D级)。(10)符合转诊标准的患者应在医院急诊科而非诊所进行评估。首选能快速获得乙二醇血清浓度且有酒精或甲吡唑治疗可用的机构。此转诊应遵循当地毒物控制中心程序和社区资源(D级)。(11)不建议在院外环境中给予酒精、甲吡唑、硫胺素或吡哆醇(D级)。

相似文献

1
Ethylene glycol exposure: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.乙二醇暴露:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005;43(5):327-45. doi: 10.1080/07313820500184971.
2
Salicylate poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.水杨酸盐中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007;45(2):95-131. doi: 10.1080/15563650600907140.
3
Methylphenidate poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.哌甲酯中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007 Oct-Nov;45(7):737-52. doi: 10.1080/15563650701665175.
4
Tricyclic antidepressant poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.三环类抗抑郁药中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007;45(3):203-33. doi: 10.1080/15563650701226192.
5
Diphenhydramine and dimenhydrinate poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.苯海拉明和茶苯海明中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44(3):205-23. doi: 10.1080/15563650600585920.
6
Camphor Poisoning: an evidence-based practice guideline for out-of-hospital management.樟脑中毒:院外管理的循证实践指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44(4):357-70. doi: 10.1080/15563650600671696.
7
Valproic acid poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.丙戊酸中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2008 Aug;46(7):661-76. doi: 10.1080/15563650802178136.
8
beta-blocker ingestion: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.β受体阻滞剂摄入:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005;43(3):131-46.
9
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor poisoning: An evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007 May;45(4):315-32. doi: 10.1080/15563650701285289.
10
Atypical antipsychotic medication poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management.非典型抗精神病药物中毒:院外管理的循证共识指南
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2007 Dec;45(8):918-42. doi: 10.1080/15563650701665142.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracorporeal treatment for ethylene glycol poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup.体外治疗乙二醇中毒:来自 EXTRIP 工作组的系统评价和建议。
Crit Care. 2023 Feb 10;27(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04227-2.
2
Ethylene Glycol Intoxication Requiring ECMO Support.需要体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)支持的乙二醇中毒
Case Rep Crit Care. 2021 Sep 29;2021:5545351. doi: 10.1155/2021/5545351. eCollection 2021.
3
Methanol poisoning as a new world challenge: A review.甲醇中毒——一项新的全球挑战:综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jun 2;66:102445. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102445. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Ethylene glycol intoxication following brake fluid ingestion complicated with unilateral facial nerve palsy: a case report.误食制动液后乙二醇中毒并发单侧面神经麻痹:一例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2019 Jul 3;13(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s13256-019-2139-z.
5
[Antifreeze poisoning : The case of a patient with repeated ethylene glycol poisoning].[防冻液中毒:一例反复发生乙二醇中毒患者的病例]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2019 Mar;114(2):159-163. doi: 10.1007/s00063-018-0439-5. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
A Case of Ethylene Glycol intoxication with Acute Renal Injury: Successful Recovery by Fomepizole and Renal Replacement Therapy.一例乙二醇中毒伴急性肾损伤:通过甲吡唑和肾脏替代疗法成功康复
Electrolyte Blood Press. 2017 Dec;15(2):47-51. doi: 10.5049/EBP.2017.15.2.47. Epub 2017 Dec 31.
7
Treatment of patients with ethylene glycol or methanol poisoning: focus on fomepizole.乙二醇或甲醇中毒患者的治疗:聚焦于甲吡唑
Open Access Emerg Med. 2010 Aug 24;2:67-75. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S5346. eCollection 2010.
8
Clinical Features of Reported Ethylene Glycol Exposures in the United States.美国报告的乙二醇暴露的临床特征。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 13;10(11):e0143044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143044. eCollection 2015.
9
Pushing the science forward: chitosan nanoparticles and functional repair of CNS tissue after spinal cord injury.推动科学进步:壳聚糖纳米颗粒与脊髓损伤后中枢神经系统组织的功能修复。
J Biol Eng. 2013 Jun 3;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1754-1611-7-15. eCollection 2013.
10
Affinity for, and localization of, PEG-functionalized silica nanoparticles to sites of damage in an ex vivo spinal cord injury model.聚乙二醇化二氧化硅纳米颗粒对体外脊髓损伤模型损伤部位的亲和力和定位。
J Biol Eng. 2012 Sep 14;6(1):18. doi: 10.1186/1754-1611-6-18.